Q Talk

[NickNack]

If I begin a thread I try to either respond or heart every reply.  An exception would be if a reply was really directed to another person responding to the thread.  I also try to reply to anyone who replies to my post in someone else's thread (hope that makes sense).  I may not if the @ and my nick name wasn't put in.  In that case I didn't see the reply.

I think it's rude to start a thread and never reply to people.  Sometimes if the person starting the thread has very few posts I think they may not know how to get back to their thread.

[hellie jo]

---

@Shanus wrote:

Isn’t there some type of etiquette that if you start a thread, the OP should check back periodly to acknowledge the replies? 

I’ve seen threads where the OP never returns and so many posters take time to post, research information, include photos, etc. 

How do you feel about this?

---

I think it would be the polite thing to acknowledge the replies in some way.

[Peaches McPhee]

@San Antonio Gal,one "thank you" is great.  There was one recent thread in which the OP came back and posted again every few hours -- thanking each individual poster.  Every poster individually.  That is what I personally object to. 

Also, we can all consider the use of TIA "thanks in advance" in our OP.  

[proudlyfromNJ]

---

@Peaches McPhee wrote:

@San Antonio Gal,one "thank you" is great.  There was one recent thread in which the OP came back and posted again every few hours -- thanking each individual poster.  Every poster individually.  That is what I personally object to. 

Also, we can all consider the use of TIA "thanks in advance" in our OP.  

---

@Peaches McPhee.  I agree. One thank you will do it. No need for each post to be thanked.

[loriqvc]

---

@San Antonio Gal wrote:

---

@Peaches McPhee wrote:

Pls don't do this, unless you have more significant info to share.  Thanking and acknowledging just gums the thread up.

---

@Peaches McPheeand all other posters :  I have thanked responses in one invidiual post such as "Thank you ladies for all your replies".  I have not thanked each post individually.  I just heart each response.   However, I was not aware that thanking posters "gums the thread up".

---

@San Antonio Gal@ - I agree with you about the individual hearts and single "group thanks" approach; you can even include all the @s you want for listing specific names in that message, if you have the time.

I don't believe common courtesy "gums up" anything, though I do agree with a few other comments here that posting direct replies to every single message is unnecessary—especially when those replies repeat information over and over, which certainly happens in some threads.

[dooBdoo]

---

@x Hedge wrote:

@dooBdoo

I think most of us (including me) breach netiquette at times, and the infractions are usually small and easily overlooked.

Something akin to propping your elbow on the dining table as you eat, while you have company.

The meal goes on, undisturbed.

But imagine removing your shoes and propping your bare feet up on the dining table while your company is eating.

I know some people no longer post here because of repeated 'foot in your face' type of netiquette infractions by just a very few posters.

---

             I think you explained that well, @x Hedge.   

             My attitude is that we might aim for something akin to "perfection" but after all we're human.   I think it helps to get various perspectives, possibly to be more self-aware -- especially in a forum that only allows the written word and often can be misinterpreted.

[dooBdoo]

            I wouldn't be too critical of those who want to thank all, or most, posters individually on their thread.   As I said, I don't feel anyone should feel obligated to do so -- nor should they (we) feel we have to "heart" every post.   Even so, I do believe some posters genuinely want to use a series of posts to let each responder know they're appreciated.  They have their own, personal reasons.   It comes from a good heart, with good intent, and from a kind and grateful spirit.    Also, not everyone is here every day, so that accounts for their "thank-you" replies popping up over a longer period of time.😊

[BirkiLady]

---

@brandiwine wrote:

I do think many posters just want to cause trouble and enjoy people getting upset.  

---

@brandiwineand Everyone -  Lately, the threads have been a nice place to visit and share information. Haven't noticed a lot of negative issues. It's been friendly on these Forums. A pleasant place to relax and wind down.

I'm good with hearting comments and adding my two cents at the end of the day! Hope that doesn't offend anyone. 

[this is my nic]

I think I always check back on my posts because I'm usually asking for opinions.  If I forget to check it's because I  posted in my sleep!  When I can't sleep, I like to visit here and I'm sure I've "sleep posted"!   smh

[BirkiLady]

@dooBdoo  "Turn off suggesions" had now been done. Who knew? Thanks! Perhaps I'll begin asking questions and sharing stuff. Not sure I'm that gutsy.  At least I'll have a clue how to begin. LOL