Wellness

[terrier3]

On 9/8/2014 Rottie_mama said:

Still no excuse for her either.

Bad behavior on his part??? Your evidence?

No excuse for a woman to not control herself just like there is no excuse for a man, period. bad behavior is bad behavior.

It is BAD BEHAVIOR to c0ck back and hit a woman in the head with your closed fist. Even prizefighters use gloves!!!! I saw it with my own two eyes. He was acting like he was in an Ali-Frazier match...not dealing with an angry woman.

Only one of the two ended up unconscious, being dragged out of the elevator.

If you think she was guilty of something too....they should have sorted it out in court.
NOT given him a plea deal.

BTW - she was a fool to marry him, IMO, and needs some serious counseling.

[terrier3]

On 9/8/2014 sidsmom said:

In the 'OMG Ranking' of this whole thing, I would say what SHE did is more of a OMG moment. Weird on so many different levels.

1A. Janay Palmer doesn't prosecute!

1B. Janay Palmer MARRIES her attacker!

1C. Ray Rice cold-punches Janay Palmer

You have a weird way of looking at life.

Cold-c0cking a woman (or a man, for that matter) is a crime...the other two are serious lapses of judgment, NOT a crime.

[sidsmom]

Thank you for reading my post. The State didn't think it was the crime as described...thus reduced to a counseling session. Get upset @ the Judge...not me.

[sunshine45]

i think someone may have withheld that video at that now closed casino and possibly delivered that tape to TMZ for maybe a decent amount of money......the ravens say that they had not seen that video either.

[burggirl]

JESSA, the column was written by David Zurawik of the Baltimore Sun, if that makes it easier to find.

[terrier3]

On 9/8/2014 sidsmom said:

Thank you for reading my post. The State didn't think it was the crime as described. Get upset @ the Judge...not me.

The state sentenced him, as a first offender, to anger management classes.

He didn't get off scott free. It was an offense.

If not an offense, he wouldn't have to take the classes....and stay out of trouble.

[sidsmom]

....and TMZ to the rescue again. They're edgy, but usually right,

[sidsmom]

On 9/8/2014 terrier3 said:

On 9/8/2014 sidsmom said:

Thank you for reading my post. The State didn't think it was the crime as described. Get upset @ the Judge...not me.

The state sentenced him, as a first offender, to anger management classes.

He didn't get off scott free. It was an offense.

If not an offense, he wouldn't have to take the classes....and stay out of trouble.

And he served his sentence. The State took care of him. As a woman, my energies are focused on HER. And her actions are getting as much attention as his actions did. Not a good representation for women....I want to take her by the shoulders & shake some sense into her!

The Legal side of this is nothing in his mind...now take away his livelihood & money? NOW it hurts. Good

[Rottie_mama]

On 9/8/2014 terrier3 said:

On 9/8/2014 Rottie_mama said:

Still no excuse for her either.

Bad behavior on his part??? Your evidence?

No excuse for a woman to not control herself just like there is no excuse for a man, period. bad behavior is bad behavior.

It is BAD BEHAVIOR to c0ck back and hit a woman in the head with your closed fist. Even prizefighters use gloves!!!! I saw it with my own two eyes. He was acting like he was in an Ali-Frazier match...not dealing with an angry woman.

Only one of the two ended up unconscious, being dragged out of the elevator.

If you think she was guilty of something too....they should have sorted it out in court.
NOT given him a plea deal.

BTW - she was a fool to marry him, IMO, and needs some serious counseling.

Totally agree. I saw her hit him before they got on the elevator too. I do not think he was justified but neither was she. You don't just resort to violence.

She is not going anywhere. She is comfy with the lifestyle, sad to say.

This manufactured outrage over the video is foolish. This was settled in court, don't like it too bad. The legal system functioned with what they had. The NFL is just doing damage control; they already ruled. Baltimore knew about all of this. Look at Baltimore's past, if you can play, they look the other way.

The NFL got caught with their pants down. They made a decision; but this is mob mentality. Now that we can see video we get to go after him again. Why? We have laws and we don't burn people at the stake because a few people are outraged over video. The case was adjudicated already. You do not get 2 bites at the apple.

I do not care for the manner in which this was resolved; but this is trying him twice just because some people saw a video now.

Be angry with how this was handled in the 1st place.

I wonder if people felt this strongly when B's sister hit Jayz in the elevator or is that ok?