Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,997
Registered: ‎03-25-2012

To Cindy at QVC Moderators

[ Edited ]

You deleted my post in CC entitled "Emotional Intelligence (EQ)" as follows: 

 

"This post has been removed by QVC because it contains political side line stories"

 

I have never complained before and think the mods do a good job overall.  But this deletion seems over the top to me, and I don't think I've ever seen it before.  OK, delete the link.  But QVC posters are no longer able to read articles that may contain many, many different side line topics?  Everything on the web contains different side line topics and ads. 

 

Is this a new rule?  The topic I posted about is not political at all and I think would have been an interesting conversation.  I am very disappointed it wasn't allowed for a completely unreasonable reason.

Formerly Ford1224
We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Elie Wiesel 1986
Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,641
Registered: ‎05-01-2010

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

@LilacTree. I have seen this before. Also saw one that had sidelines of ..how should I put this....things anyone under 18 should not be viewing.

 

Just thought I'd let you know what I have seen. I have so much trouble with the font! Sorry!

Regular Contributor
Posts: 236
Registered: ‎05-21-2017

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

@LilacTree

I know. Also, people running to the Mods to report posters and posts.  Some people have nothing better to do.  Board Monitors.  Well.  I've made my feelings clear in another thread on this subject. .

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,509
Registered: ‎07-18-2016

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

The mods don't blindly delete everything that is reported. They read it and determine if it should be themselves.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,733
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators


@proudlyfromNJ wrote:

@LilacTree. I have seen this before. Also saw one that had sidelines of ..how should I put this....things anyone under 18 should not be viewing.

 

Just thought I'd let you know what I have seen. I have so much trouble with the font! Sorry!


Seems as if the moderator based the deletion on this Standard:

 

Do not post web addresses (URLs) for, or links to, outside sites that violate these guidelines.


~Who in the world am I? Ah, that's the great puzzle~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

[ Edited ]

@LilacTree wrote:

You deleted my post in CC entitled "Emotional Intelligence (EQ)" as follows: 

 

"This post has been removed by QVC because it contains political side line stories"

 

I have never complained before and think the mods do a good job overall.  But this deletion seems over the top to me, and I don't think I've ever seen it before.  OK, delete the link.  But QVC posters are no longer able to read articles that may contain many, many different side line topics?  Everything on the web contains different side line topics and ads. 

 

Is this a new rule?  The topic I posted about is not political at all and I think would have been an interesting conversation.  I am very disappointed it wasn't allowed for a completely unreasonable reason.


@LilacTree  The same thing happened to me last week.  I posted a link to a British newspaper site that had photos of Geo. and Amal Clooney's mansion outside London to show a poster here the house they'd purchased there.   My post was deleted because, unbeknownst to me, some of the "side" photos along the margins of the article - which I'd never even noticed - were too risque for this audience (I think the offending photo had a topless sunbather you could barely see  because the photo was taken from so far away.

 

So no, it's not just your post.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,268
Registered: ‎11-15-2011

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

[ Edited ]

They delete posts for no apparent reason but ignore requests to delete one.

 

 

They forget that they are young and they may be well educated but lack a lot of life experiences.  Otherwise, they would understand!

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,210
Registered: ‎03-23-2010

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

A few weeks ago someone posted a link to TMZ that had sidebar photos that one would not necessarily associate with QVC:  actress in a see-thru top with no bra or efforts to censor the photo, bare bottoms in string thong bikinis, etc.  Lots of racy photos (sexual captions) with bare breasts & bottoms, but moderators had no problems with that link, so it makes me wonder where they draw the line.  Guess no politics, but nudity and sex talk are okay?  

 

Need more consistency IMO.

Regular Contributor
Posts: 236
Registered: ‎05-21-2017

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

[ Edited ]

@StraytoStay wrote:

The mods don't blindly delete everything that is reported. They read it and determine if it should be themselves.


Who said anything about the Mods blindly deleting posts? If you're referring to my comment (even if you're not), I'm commenting on the reporters who elect themselves the Board Police not the Mods (although, there's often very little discernment going on in choices made -- now that you mention it)..

Honored Contributor
Posts: 14,000
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: To Cindy at QVC Moderators

There have been at least two threads recently asking for prayers for an ill person.  Yet a joke mentioning prayers was deleted for being "religious."