Q Talk

[Spurt]

---

@blueroses47 wrote:

I agree that there is an awful lot of Logo, and I find it odd because there isn't a whole lot of variety in what she presents.  Now, I have maybe a dozen LOGO items, and I like the look and feel of them, but I think I have enough now, and I also feel they are very expensive for what they are.  I have other similar tops that I've found at Marshalls and stores like that, that are every bit as nicely made, and are under $20.  Also, I find this idea of layering not to my liking.  It looks silly and a little sloppy, so I"m only wearing one at a time.

I just wonder how long she'll be able to go on selling so much of her line,  when  there is so little variety.  I think at some point, sales will go down drastically when people start tiring of the look.

Maybe, though, she'll branch out to other styles.  Oddly enough, one of the first LOGO items I bought years ago, before she had her own shows, was a very different style of lightweight jacket.  It was short and fitted, and had cute ruffles down the front and over the shoulder area.  I bought two, I liked it so much, one tan and one black. 

But yes, there is an overabundance of LOGO and I wonder how long it will go on this way.

---

@blueroses47

Well said.............and yes even those that like Logo will come to the point where they say enough and want something else............

I dont see how Logo is really enticing with all those layers in the warmer/hotter parts of the U.S. ----around here its short sleeves or sleeveless t-shirts,, tank-tops, blouses with capris or shorts or skirts and sun dresses ............we wanna dress as cool as we can......and even with A/C the stores and restaurants and movie theaters arent that cool......

[Pearlee]

---

@Spurt wrote:

---

@blueroses47 wrote:

I agree that there is an awful lot of Logo, and I find it odd because there isn't a whole lot of variety in what she presents.  Now, I have maybe a dozen LOGO items, and I like the look and feel of them, but I think I have enough now, and I also feel they are very expensive for what they are.  I have other similar tops that I've found at Marshalls and stores like that, that are every bit as nicely made, and are under $20.  Also, I find this idea of layering not to my liking.  It looks silly and a little sloppy, so I"m only wearing one at a time.

I just wonder how long she'll be able to go on selling so much of her line,  when  there is so little variety.  I think at some point, sales will go down drastically when people start tiring of the look.

Maybe, though, she'll branch out to other styles.  Oddly enough, one of the first LOGO items I bought years ago, before she had her own shows, was a very different style of lightweight jacket.  It was short and fitted, and had cute ruffles down the front and over the shoulder area.  I bought two, I liked it so much, one tan and one black. 

But yes, there is an overabundance of LOGO and I wonder how long it will go on this way.

---

@blueroses47

Well said.............and yes even those that like Logo will come to the point where they say enough and want something else............

I dont see how Logo is really enticing with all those layers in the warmer/hotter parts of the U.S. ----around here its short sleeves or sleeveless t-shirts,, tank-tops, blouses with capris or shorts or skirts and sun dresses ............we wanna dress as cool as we can......and even with A/C the stores and restaurants and movie theaters arent that cool......

---

@Spurt  It's enticing because I don't layer - and most of the LOGO ladies in the subforum don't either.  It's really very simple indeed.  And most of her cotton slub fabrics that I own are like wearing as next to nothing as you can in clothing when it's hot. it's perfect for the hottest weather.  If I go shlep around a summer arts and craft festival where I know I'm going to get really sweltering hot, I always wear Logo cotton slub.  If you think we Logo ladies only do what we see demonstrated on TV and don't have our own styles in how we wear LOGO then you are quite mistaken.

[Daysdee]

I don't care for LOGO so I don't watch.  I know they are on a lot because the line is selling very well.  Same with IT Cosmetics which seems to be on every week.  Susan Graver has had  a weekly show for years and she is on many other times each week too.  All these lines are making money for QVC.  At some point their sales will drop off (maybe not SG) and they will be on less.  Remember when Bare Escentuals/Minerals was on often and had 3 or 4 TSV's every year?  They are still on, but not very often.  Tova's products cut way back, Smashbox gone, Models Prefer gone (now YBF on HSN), Diana Young ,  Victoria Principal, all gone from QVC.   Clothing line Victor Costa and Simonton--no longer on QVC.    Oreck Vacuums haven't been on much now it  is Shark, etc.    Those that don't  make the sales are cut.     I think if  some of these popular brands now were on a little less, it would be more interesting but I guess their sales numbers  don't indicate that.     

[Kachina624]

I don't mind the Logo clothing.  I've never seen a person here wear anything that looks like it but it's okay.  However, I think Lori Goldstein is the worse presenter on shopping TV.  She drives me crazy flitting here and there, pulling clothes out from behind the item being shown, running over to the models etc., etc.   She is the mistress of riduculous superlatives.  There is absolutely nothing amazing or phenomenal about her clothing.  If I was going to buy an item, I wouldn't know where to start.   I sit down and think I'm going to watch a show and I can't make 5 minutes. 

She'd be wise to stick to designing and hire someone to do the presenting on TV. 

[bonnielu]

People buy it they continue to sell it.  It is probably that simple.  I might look but then I search other places to find the same exact thing at a better price.  Zulily, part of QVC has Logo like tops.  I find that even Walmart has selections which I get compliments when I wear it.   I kind of chuckle since I think $14.99 is the top price I have ever paid. 

[hyacinth003]

I don't understand why people get so upset when posters post that they don't like something.  So what?  This is a forum, and people have different opinions.

I am not a new poster (as some have been suggested) and I don't like most of it either.  Every once in awhile I come across a piece I may like.  I don't watch the shows since I don't like it.  Overlayering in the summer does puzzle me though.  I can't imagine wearing most of it in the Chicago area in the summer. 

If a post upsets one, why keep reading it and chastising the person who holds that opinion.  Just like telling people to change the channel, don't read the posts.

Hyacinth

[Pearlee]

---

@hyacinth003 wrote:

I don't understand why people get so upset when posters post that they don't like something.  So what?  This is a forum, and people have different opinions.

I am not a new poster (as some have been suggested) and I don't like most of it either.  Every once in awhile I come across a piece I may like.  I don't watch the shows since I don't like it.  Overlayering in the summer does puzzle me though.  I can't imagine wearing most of it in the Chicago area in the summer. 

If a post upsets one, why keep reading it and chastising the person who holds that opinion.  Just like telling people to change the channel, don't read the posts.

Hyacinth

---

@hyacinth003  If you have seen enough times on this board people getting upset, then you should have also seen the reason which has been posted dozesn and dozens of times.  People don't get upset when someone says they don't like the clothes. It's when not liking the clothes in a rude and insensitive manner to those who do that is the problem.  Why don't you remember that part? People can dislike anything they want to and express on the board.  What bothers me is the insulting and rude way many people express that about LOGO, knowing lots of people here buy it, wear it and love it.  What about that is not getting through to you?  Would you sit with people at a lunch table, two of whom are wearing red, and tell them to their faces "nobody looks good in red" or "you are wearing clown clothes" or "you look like bag ladies?"   No?  Well that's what people do here, knowing people who wear LOGO are on the board.   There are much nicer and more polite ways to express dislike for something. That doesn't bother me at all.   There is some LOGO that I don't like either, and I post that in the LOGO forum when I don't  -- as do others of us.  But we aren't offensive and rude about it.

[millieshops]

@Spurt  You may be right, but I'm not buying into all the doom and gloom here about what's going on with QVC.

[Cumbercookie13]

The title of this thread could be said about the repetitive LOGO complaints. This horse has beaten into the ground so much it's probably reached the pits of hell by now. 

[suzyQ3]

---

@Kachina624 wrote:

I don't mind the Logo clothing.  I've never seen a person here wear anything that looks like it but it's okay.  However, I think Lori Goldstein is the worse presenter on shopping TV.  She drives me crazy flitting here and there, pulling clothes out from behind the item being shown, running over to the models etc., etc.   She is the mistress of riduculous superlatives.  There is absolutely nothing amazing or phenomenal about her clothing.  If I was going to buy an item, I wouldn't know where to start.   I sit down and think I'm going to watch a show and I can't make 5 minutes. 

She'd be wise to stick to designing and hire someone to do the presenting on TV. 

---

@Kachina624, you forgot "obsessed."