Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 24,685
Registered: ‎07-21-2011

I have now seen two specials on Epstein with mention of Andrew.  Andrew was a good friend and he knew exactly what Epstein was all about.  Anyone that knew Epstein knew he was into young girls.  Andrew is guilty and I believe the Thursday night they aired the first special, the royals came out with the Harry & Meghan announcement to take the light off of Epstein/Andrew.  I think it is totally sick. To think that some men with money do whatever they want ----Cat Mad Exploiting and trafficking young girls.

kindness is strength
Regular Contributor
Posts: 233
Registered: ‎03-20-2010

@Porcelain wrote:

@beach-mom wrote:

Here's where I'm coming from. Way back in the "My Space" days, my friends'son was lured by a 13 year old saying she was 19. I saw the picture she sent him. She was half dressed, turned sideways looking over her shoulder. She looked a lot older that 13. He was 22 at the time. I had been around him a lot. Nice boy, great family, VERY good looking, good job. Anyway they chatted, after a few weeks found out they had a lot in common (or so she told him), and agreed to meet. Before they met, her brother found out, told his parents, and contacted my friend's son saying she was only 13 and to "leave my sister alone." My friend's son apologized and backed away. But she contacted him again, complimenting him, and telling him she loved him, and it was OK, they were "only" 9 years apart, blah blah, blah. By this time he had feelings for her too (again thinking she was 19). But he still broke off contact, telling her he couldn't believe she lied to him about her age. A few days later she contacted him asking him to meet her at the local mall to say goodbye (they had never met in person). He said OK (which was REALLY stupid of him). You probably know what's coming - the last time she contacted him, it wasn't "her," and the police were waiting for him. He went to jail.


 

Your friend's son was 22 and went to go meet a girl he knew at the time was 13. He made an adult decision and suffered the consequences. I'm glad the police got him.


I agree with this wholeheartedly. He was a 22-year old adult and he was preying on a 13-year old child. There's a word for someone like him -- pedophile: a person who is sexually attracted to children. Thank goodness he got nabbed by the police.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 79,488
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@PamfromCT wrote:

Why on earth would anyone have such a continued relationship with a man notorious for procuring little girls for sex?  I can think of only one reason.  I don’t believe for a minute Andrew didn’t know what was going on.  His interview was a disaster.


@PamfromCT.  Poor self-esteem.  She doesnt think she deserves any better.   This is verified by her sloppy personal appearance. 

 

20200127_130633.png

New Mexico☀️Land Of Enchantment
Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,059
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

@Kachina624- I thought @PamfromCT was referring to Andrew and his friendship with Epstein - not Sarah's with her husband.

 

And, yes, Sarah probably does have some self-esteem issues, just like millions of other people.  The difference is, hers have always had a great, big spotlight shone on them.  Not easy for anyone to deal with.  The tabloids were (and still are) vicious to her.

 

"" A little learning is a dangerous thing."-Alexander Pope
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,905
Registered: ‎08-28-2010

@Venezia wrote:

@Kachina624- I thought @PamfromCT was referring to Andrew and his friendship with Epstein - not Sarah's with her husband.

 

And, yes, Sarah probably does have some self-esteem issues, just like millions of other people.  The difference is, hers have always had a great, big spotlight shone on them.  Not easy for anyone to deal with.  The tabloids were (and still are) vicious to her.

 


Yes, referring to as the Duchess of Pork.  Horrible.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

According to the NY Post, Andrew's family is having trouble finding people to come to his birthday party this Wednesday.  Well, I don't feel sorry for him. From the NY Post article:

 

"Prince Andrew’s family is scrambling to send last-minute invites to his 60th birthday on Wednesday — because he is being “shunned” by so many former friends, according to a report. [Andrew]  is celebrating hitting the milestone age Wednesday with a private dinner at Royal Lodge, the Windsor residence he shares with his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.

... [His family is] struggling to even fill the smaller party [than the one originally planned]  because so many people are saying they are “unavailable,” ...

To save embarrassment, last-minute invites are being sent to “second-tier guests” to make up the numbers, ...which says it highlights Andrew’s “dizzying fall from grace.”

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are believed to be among those who have snubbed the party, and are instead sending a gift and a video message to be played there,"

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,576
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

Re: Prince Andrew

[ Edited ]

The New York Post is a tabloid and doesn't have any credibility with me.  I would think Andrew would know by now whom to invite, who his friends still are, if he even is having a birthday party.

 

BTW, I do think Andrew participated in the under-age "parties."  He is only the "tip of the iceburg."  I wonder if the public will ever know the full extent of the "guests."

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,599
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@DottieBlue wrote:

The New York Post is a tabloid and doesn't have any credibility with me.  I would think Andrew would know by now whom to invite, who his friends still are, if he even is having a birthday party.

 

BTW, I do think Andrew participated in the under-age "parties."  He is only the "tip of the iceburg."  I wonder if the public will ever know the full extent of the "guests."


Probably not because Epstein conveniently "committed suicide" after some pretty high profile visits.


'I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with an unarmed man'.......Unknown
Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,624
Registered: ‎03-09-2010
Sorry. Unavailable. I have a root canal that day. Whatever day that is.
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,188
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

@Vivian wrote:

Over the generations, the royal family were not exactly known for their brilliance. Prince Edward VIII was bearly literate. His father was a notorious womanizer, spending his mother's reign in going from one house party to another. 

 

As far as Andrew goes, just because he was taught to speak proper English does not mean he Is a genius. Add to that a sense of entitlement, and the freedom of NOT becoming king, and VOILÀ a playboy is created...not just any playboy, but one who associated with Epstein. The parties, the private planes, the young girls...Andrew was hooked. He was a moron. What did he think would happen in that dreadful interview? What a perverted fool.


I think Prince Charles has followed in his footsteps. And - the Royals love their alcohol.