Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
10-11-2020 02:15 PM
10-11-2020 02:21 PM - edited 10-11-2020 02:22 PM
@Pearlee - That still doesn't justify the broad, sweeping generalizations and the extremes some people take things to - imputing motives that they can't possibly know.
We can all form an opinion of someone based on his/her actual words in live interviews or perhaps from a book written by that person.
However, that's just an opinion. Saying that Harry's trip to England is a tax scam (for example), is a bridge too far. These threads always spiral down the rabbit hole. IMO.
10-11-2020 02:41 PM
The use of tax scam was a poor choice of words. He is subject to US taxes if he stays more than 183 days per US Tax code due to the Visa he holds. So he must return to England before the 183 days expire. Meghan is an American citizen,only, so she is subject to US taxes on her income. Questions have been raised if the income they both received while performing Royal Duties would expose that income to be subject to US taxes as well. No ruling has been reported as yet. It raises questions for me regarding the payment from Netflix.Was the payment in both names. only her name or was it payable to a Corporation? The answer would affect the liability for US taxes. Yes, I work with numbers!!!
10-11-2020 02:47 PM
My wise mother would rarely opine or criticize about things of this nature but always would say, "actions speak louder than words"!
10-11-2020 03:27 PM
10-11-2020 03:29 PM
Hope grandma ma keeps in memory, life is short. It's precious too.
10-11-2020 05:33 PM
@Pearlee wrote:
@RoughDraft. Your second sentence negates your first. There is no reason to think anyone is "more invested" in British royalty due to the reason you have already acknowledged.
@Pearlee I never said anyone was more invested in British Royalty. I merely stated that we are not permitted to discuss the other matter on this forum.
10-11-2020 06:07 PM
10-11-2020 06:57 PM
@Pearlee wrote:
@RoughDraft. Well you did in your first sentence if your post, which now appears to be gone.
How about that!
10-11-2020 07:24 PM
@RoughDraft wrote:
@Pearlee wrote:
@RoughDraft. Well you did in your first sentence if your post, which now appears to be gone.
How about that!
It's magic, I tell you, absolute magic! @RoughDraft. But you're in good company, if I don't say so myself.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788