Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
05-24-2019 04:08 PM
@Mindy D wrote:
@sidsmom wrote:I question this study.
When it concludes low dairy intake is a contributor to cancer?
Doesn’t make sense...especially when there is a
mountain of evidence which proves differently.
🤔Wonder who funded this study....?🤔
The results were only a statistical correlation. There could be causal factors within the low dairy correlation, such as low calcium intake for people. It’s not necessarily that low DAIRY causes cancer. It could be that things found in dairy are lacking the diet of the people with cancer.
It still doesn’t make sense.
Low calcium is not a contributor to cancer.
In fact, many, many official studies prove low dairy reduces the risk of cancer....so when this comes out saying people need to consume
more dairy to reduce their risk, I read that with very ‘raised eyebrow.’
In summary....zero dairy=healthier lifestyle.
05-24-2019 04:09 PM
@Mindy D wrote:Body mass is only a small part of the findings of the study. Eating of whole grains is an important result.
That, as well as reduction of processed meats
(like bacon/luncheon meat) and beef, is something I agree with!
🌼💛
05-24-2019 04:13 PM
@sidsmom wrote:
@Mindy D wrote:Body mass is only a small part of the findings of the study. Eating of whole grains is an important result.
That, as well as reduction of processed meats
(like bacon/luncheon meat) and beef, is something I agree with!
🌼💛
The study was primarily funded by the National Institute of health. There were no private companies involved in the funding. I’m trying to provide a link to the full, original study.
05-24-2019 04:20 PM - edited 05-24-2019 04:25 PM
Original study is only available as a pdf.
The comple, original study can be read here. Scroll down just below the article and press “PDF”
https://academic.oup.com/jncics/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jncics/pkz034/5492023
05-24-2019 04:39 PM - edited 05-24-2019 04:45 PM
@sidsmom wrote:
@Mindy D wrote:
@sidsmom wrote:I question this study.
When it concludes low dairy intake is a contributor to cancer?
Doesn’t make sense...especially when there is a
mountain of evidence which proves differently.
🤔Wonder who funded this study....?🤔
The results were only a statistical correlation. There could be causal factors within the low dairy correlation, such as low calcium intake for people. It’s not necessarily that low DAIRY causes cancer. It could be that things found in dairy are lacking the diet of the people with cancer.
It still doesn’t make sense.
Low calcium is not a contributor to cancer.
In fact, many, many official studies prove low dairy reduces the risk of cancer....so when this comes out saying people need to consume
more dairy to reduce their risk, I read that with very ‘raised eyebrow.’
In summary....zero dairy=healthier lifestyle.
The study does not say that low dairy intake is a contributor to cancer. The study found that low dairy intake is ASSOCIATED WITH a higher incidence of cancer. The incidence is not large.a For your own edification, Sid’s Mom. Carefully read the study and article. I know that you are highly interested in nutrition. By cancer type, colorectal cancer had the highest number and proportion of diet-related cases (52225, 38.3%). By diet, low consumption of whole grains (27763, 1.8%) and dairy products (17692, 1.2%). Low consumption of dairy was associated with a 1.2% increase in incidence. That’s not very high and it’s a correlation not a causation.
05-24-2019 04:52 PM
My personal takeaway from the study is that I need to watch my intake of whole grains.
05-24-2019 05:13 PM - edited 05-24-2019 05:14 PM
@Mindy D wrote:
@sidsmom wrote:
@Mindy D wrote:
@sidsmom wrote:I question this study.
When it concludes low dairy intake is a contributor to cancer?
Doesn’t make sense...especially when there is a
mountain of evidence which proves differently.
🤔Wonder who funded this study....?🤔
The results were only a statistical correlation. There could be causal factors within the low dairy correlation, such as low calcium intake for people. It’s not necessarily that low DAIRY causes cancer. It could be that things found in dairy are lacking the diet of the people with cancer.
It still doesn’t make sense.
Low calcium is not a contributor to cancer.
In fact, many, many official studies prove low dairy reduces the risk of cancer....so when this comes out saying people need to consume
more dairy to reduce their risk, I read that with very ‘raised eyebrow.’
In summary....zero dairy=healthier lifestyle.
The study does not say that low dairy intake is a contributor to cancer. The study found that low dairy intake is ASSOCIATED WITH a higher incidence of cancer. The incidence is not large.a For your own edification, Sid’s Mom. Carefully read the study and article. I know that you are highly interested in nutrition. By cancer type, colorectal cancer had the highest number and proportion of diet-related cases (52225, 38.3%). By diet, low consumption of whole grains (27763, 1.8%) and dairy products (17692, 1.2%). Low consumption of dairy was associated with a 1.2% increase in incidence. That’s not very high and it’s a correlation not a causation.
Not being very high and it being correlation/causation is understandable
but the fact low dairy is even mentioned in the same sentence as
insufficient whole grain intake (bad) & excess processed meat intake (bad)
makes one wonder who is behind the low-dairy-intake=bad conclusion.
The three leading dietary factors attributable to cancer burden
through direct associations were insufficient whole grain intake,
insufficient dairy intake, and excess processed meat intake,
accounting for 26268 (1.7%), 17692 (1.2%), and 12741 (0.8%)
new cancer cases; and the two leading dietary factors attributable
to cancer burden through BMI- mediated associations were
low fruit intake and high SSB consumption, accounting for 3129 (0.2%)
and 3119 (0.2%) of new cancer cases.
05-24-2019 06:07 PM
This “study” is worthless.
05-30-2019 12:08 AM
@ellaphant wrote:Not surprised at all. Americans have the worst eating habits of all and highest rate of obesity. Processed foods, hight fat and sugar products. The averge woman now 5'4" and 140 pounds??? Way too heavy. Wake up, people! Eat well, lose the weight, and stay healthy.
I would love to be 140 again at 5'4". I am bigger boned (honest) and I look quite decent at 140. When I was in high school I was 110-115 and of course looked terrific, but my face would really be on the floor at that weight now. I do agree with eating well and being healthy.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788