Home

[Desertdi]

Very 1970's -- Los Angeles

[CANDLEQUEEN]

Definitely overkill!

[Imaoldhippie]

I think it is beautiful, would I have it in my house?  No, because its impractical.

[shoptilyadropagain]

Less is definitely more in this case!!!  To top it off, I'm not a flower lover but this wouldn't appeal to me even if I were.  The furniture is hideous too.

[sometimesQVCaddict]

Let's be totally honest in saying if you have a room that size, YOU are not the person either watering, pruning and/or dusting!

I think it's absolutely magnificent!! It's not a main living room, so you wouldn't be breathing it in 24/7 and plants are good for the indoor air quality anyway! Love it! Sooo bright and cheery!!

[Elodie2]

Reminds me of a hotel atrium I was once in.  The flowers, if real, would leave a mess with spent leaves and blooms falling to the floor.  Overdone to the extinct of gauche.

[kindred cats]

Makes for an impressive hotel lobby or funeral home but not for everyone....

[chrystaltree]

Lovely to look at in a picture but but it would be ridiculous in real life.

[moonandthestars]

@Kachina624 If the flowers are real, then I think this room is magical!  If they are real, I'm not sure how they are watered or who would be doing that - perhaps they might have an installed watering system for some of the planters, etc.   For the bouquets I would guess someone has to go up on a ladder to water or replace.  Pretty high mantenance - but definitely something that could be done and I think worth the effort.  Is this a private home?  Or?

Fyi, I would also like this room without the flowers - The windows are great (who is washing those? lol) , there is beautiful light.  Love the tall ceiling. 

[Kachina624]

---

@kindred cats wrote:

Makes for an impressive hotel lobby or funeral home but not for everyone....

---

@kindred cats    It reminds me of the public rooms in the large, expensive senior apartment building where my dad lived for awhile.  Silk flower overload.