Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,155
Registered: ‎06-17-2015

Re: # of posts count accurate?


@proudlyfromNJ wrote:

@hckynut wrote:

@Cakers3 wrote:

 

Sheesh-it's just a question asked by @KathyPet.

 


 

 

@Cakers3

 

My thoughts exactly !

 

 

 

hckynut(john)


I agree the first part was just a question. Then she goes on to say she actually did the math on some posters sign up dates and number of posts to figure out how many posts they made a day. And then then basically stated "wow, every day for a year and they make five or six posts". What business is it of hers to see how many posts someone makes and then dis them for it. 

 

I think the second half of her post was very rude. 


@proudlyfromNJ  I read that to mean she herself couldn't find enough interesting threads to post on, not that posters spent too much time posting.  I could be wrong.

 

It's not the first time post counts have been analyzed.  LOL

 

But I find it just as rude to tell the OP that they have better things to do, especially the navel lint remark.

 

I don't think her intent was to be rude; but again, I could be wrong.  I just didn't read it that way.

 

jmoymmv

 

@KathyPet

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,363
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: # of posts count accurate?

But then there are people like you @Cakers3 who feel they must respond and scold those who disagree with your friends. I find it strange that you singled MY REMARKS out over others who posted ahead of me.

 

 

As I said, carry on.

 

And what is wrong with navel lint? Woman LOL It's organic and gluten free! 

 

☼The best place to seek God is in a garden. You can dig for him there. GBShaw☼