Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,837
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Prince Charles?

[ Edited ]

@willomenia wrote:
Camilla is as royal as Kate, which means not at all. Kate is really a commoner as well. Charles deserves to be the next king, he's prepared his whole life for this.

I don't have a problem with camilla not being a royal, and think kate is just great. It is charles i have the problem with.

When you lose some one you L~O~V~E, that Memory of them, becomes a TREASURE.
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,475
Registered: ‎03-14-2015

Charles will one day sit on the throne.

 

His marriage to Diana was an arraigned marriage, imho.

 

He was a man of a "certain age", who had not yet settled down, and produced an heir.

 

His wife had to meet certain criterias, and Camillia didn't.

Highlighted
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,006
Registered: ‎04-04-2015

It's interesting in watching "The Crown" to hear the history of the monarchy.  Apparently while the Prime Minister is the head of government representing and responsible to the people, the monarch is a representative of and responsible to God.

 

Now whatever you may think of that - it is apparently the tradition.

 

So using that logic, it doesn't matter what the culture  or  the people - think about adultery, divorce, remarriage etc.

 

And yes of course, previous monarchs (Henry VIII certainly comes immediately to mind) certainly weren't concerned much with what God might have thought of their escapades, and examples.  So it will indeed be interesting to see what happens when Elizabeth dies or gives up the crown.

 

 

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 22,267
Registered: ‎10-25-2010

Re: Prince Charles?

[ Edited ]

He is next in line, but by the time his mother resigns or dies, he will be an old man. He is 68 years old already. She doesn't seem ready to hand it over.

 

He probably won't be King for very long before Williams takes over.  

 

I think Charles is a wimp and slightly off.  He has allowed his mother to take over his life and make him miserable.  I am glad he finally is with Camilla, but if he loved her, he should have taken a stand and not been sneaking around with her.

 

I think William is a fine man and he will do very well as King. He is more in tune with the common people. William's son is third in line.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

@Carmie wrote:

He is next in line, but by the time his mother resigns or dies, he will be an old man. He is 68 years old already. She doesn't seem ready to hand it over.

 

He probably won't be King for very long before Williams takes over.  

 

I think Charles is a wimp and slightly off.  He has allowed his mother to take over his life and make him miserable.  I am glad he finally is with Camilla, but if he loved her, he should have taken a stand and not been sneaking around with her.

 

I think William is a fine man and he will do very well as King. He is more in tune with the common people. William's son is third in line.


@Carmie  I don't think she will ever "hand it over."  She will die as queen and then Charles will ascend to the throne.  Meantime, she will delegate more and more of her official duties, as she has been for the past few years.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 22,267
Registered: ‎10-25-2010

@Pearlee wrote:

@Carmie wrote:

He is next in line, but by the time his mother resigns or dies, he will be an old man. He is 68 years old already. She doesn't seem ready to hand it over.

 

He probably won't be King for very long before Williams takes over.  

 

I think Charles is a wimp and slightly off.  He has allowed his mother to take over his life and make him miserable.  I am glad he finally is with Camilla, but if he loved her, he should have taken a stand and not been sneaking around with her.

 

I think William is a fine man and he will do very well as King. He is more in tune with the common people. William's son is third in line.


@Carmie  I don't think she will ever "hand it over."  She will die as queen and then Charles will ascend to the throne.  Meantime, she will delegate more and more of her official duties, as she has been for the past few years.


I totally agree and Charles will have to wait until she does.   He's not getting any younger.  I think she is quite stubborn or doesn't trust Charles' judgement.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,509
Registered: ‎07-18-2016

I really don't know if this is true, but heard he was out of favor & that they were going to skip to his son. I can't remember where I heard that.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,447
Registered: ‎01-22-2016

Re: Prince Charles?

[ Edited ]
Funny how people see things differently. I always found Charles not only attractive charming and kind hearted. Charles and Camilla love survived. Glad together at last. Charles should be King. When the time comes Prince William shall make a fine King.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,739
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I hope its a long time before William  becomes king. It is a terrible burden, and  he has a young family

 

I wish him and Kate a long time to live in the background, to raise their kiddies, out of the limelight, as much as possible

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,107
Registered: ‎03-17-2010

@chrystaltree wrote:

Why wouldn't he be?  He married the love of his life and Camilla has been one of the "work horses" of the royal family.  She takes the job very seriously and works very hard; much like Princess Anne.  She was accepted by the public long ago and they think very highly of her.  I'm not convinced that she will not be given the title of Queen when Charles takes the thrown.


As the wife of the King she would be the King's Queen Consort...

 

The spouse of the King or Queen (England) would officially be known as Prince or Princess Consorts. Under existing laws and precedent, the wives of ruling Kings become Queen consorts but the husbands of sovereign Queens do not have the right to any title. It is the reason why the Duke of Edinburgh is not known as King Philip.

 

In general, the consorts of monarchs have no power per se, even when their position is constitutionally or statutorily recognized. However, often the queen consort of a deceased king (the dowager queen or queen mother) has served as regent if her child, the successor to the throne, was still a minor — for example:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_consort

 

 

*~"Never eat more than you can lift......" Miss Piggy~*