Prince Andrew - Page 3

goldensrbest · ‎03-10-2010

@GenXmuse wrote:
Why give him the benefit of the doubt but not Markle?

ON THE MARK!!!! YES,A THOUSAND TIMES.

When you lose some one you L~O~V~E, that Memory of them, becomes a TREASURE.

faeriemoon · ‎03-14-2010

@Highlands72 wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
Does anyone really believe that Prince Andrew needed Epstein to procure underage girls for him? Other than this, he never was known for a history of preferring young girls.

Is it possible that he may have taken a photo (clearly with others around) with it being nothing more than obliging someone who wanted a photo?

If anything did happen, is it possible she lied about her age? I knew someone who was 14, but told everyone she was 19. And she looked it; makeup, clothes, the whole bit. I told one guy I knew that she was jailbait and he was stunned.

Sorry, I don't believe a word of this particular woman's story in this regard. She also tried to implicate a number of other high-profile men, but has dropped those accusations and instead seems to have focused on Andrew. I wonder why?

They have shown that one of the occasions, when she claimed to have been with him, that he was on vacation with his two daughters in a different country. So...she got that wrong, but everything else is the truth?

Did he exhibit bad judgment in befriending Epstein? In hindsight, very likely. But that doesn't make him guilty of these accusations and I'm not assuming anything else. JMHO.
---

For the most part, I agree. The troubling part, even if he committed no crime, is that he continued this friendship even after Epstein had been convicted of being a pedophile. At a minimum, Andrew is guilty of extreme bad judgment; beyond that, we may never know.

YESSSSS!!!! Totally agree!!! Remaining friends with Epstein makes him sleazy (and stupid) even if he is innocent of everything else.

Edited to add: STUPID

~What a terrible era in which idiots govern the blind.~ William Shakespeare

Barbara-QVC · ‎10-12-2015

Moved:

This post has been removed by QVC because it is political.

Shawnie · ‎03-10-2010

Is there something new here? He was discussed in depth after the infamous interview before Christmas.

Pearlee · ‎06-11-2011

@Shawnie wrote:
Is there something new here? He was discussed in depth after the infamous interview before Christmas.

@Shawnie The "new" is that a poster on one of the Markle threads wanted to discuss this and the OP told her to start a new thread in that case, but the OP did instead.

Alison Wonderland · ‎02-05-2018

@chrystaltree wrote:
I don't even care, Andrew is not going to be charged or arrested for anything. That's not going to happen. Epstein is dead so the whole thing is over.

Is it ever over for their victims?

occasionalrain · ‎03-10-2010

@Shawnie Nothing new as far as I know. Posters have complained that Meghan has been discussed while the, xxx Andrew has been given a pass. Thought I'd give an opportunity for equal time.

dulwich · ‎01-18-2012

Andrew and Fergie both love the high life. Both followed the money. - loved wealthy people, holidayed

in their wealthy ‘friends’ villas and yachts - always after freebies always using their titles to get an ‘in’. Both have been involved in shady business deals over the years.

Epstein another wealthy friend for Andrew so nothing surprises me that he would get - maybe - unknowlingly involved as, to me, he is not the sharpest tool in the box - e,g. his interview.

He will never really face the music Mummywill always protect him. I feel for his daughters. Both he and Fergie lying low at the minute thank goodness better without either of them.