Book Club

[lgfan]

@Free2be 

"@lgfan wrote:
If there are "fruitcakes" out there they will be influenced by H and M's tell all book, six piece docu series and a multitude of interviews. It won't be because of anything that is said on anonymous message boards.

Probably true about message boards but bullies are influenced by other bullies, it spreads like a virus which is why it is here.  You also prove my point about blame -- If they are harmed, it will be their own fault -- a warped perspective.  How do you hold on to that?  It's really quite sick.

What would you have them do to make you feel interally better?  And why as a supposedly healthy individual do you need that? 

I think I'm ready to give up on making any headway.  I do get that people will hang on to their right to hate to the death.  It's very evident in our society, I just wish people would fight against it instead of leaping into it."

What bullies are you talking about.  No one is bullying them.  H and M are doing whatever they want.  It doesn't matter what people say.  If they are harmed it is because they are bringing unnecessary attention to themselves.  They wanted privacy but yet they continue with their "Privacy Tour".    

Once again that word hate.  I guess it is so easy to use when people don't agree with you.  I think that you are being a little overdramatic.  

[KKJ]

A LITTLE overdramatic?  I find it quite disturbing those that seem to go off the rails in their absolute defense of this couple and resort to name-calling (bullies, haters,etc) and yet think it's US who are sick? And why the dramatics where they're concerned? No one said they hated them. Some just don't approve of their entitled tone-deaf behavior and hypocrisy. I think you @Free2be are the one being a bully by calling names to those you don't agree with.

[lgfan]

@KKJ "A LITTLE overdramatic?  I find it quite disturbing those that seem to go off the rails in their absolute defense of this couple and resort to name-calling (bullies, haters,etc) and yet think it's US who are sick? And why the dramatics where they're concerned? No one said they hated them. Some just don't approve of their entitled tone-deaf behavior and hypocrisy. I think you @Free2be are the one being a bully by calling names to those you don't agree with."

You are right KKJ.  She was being extremely overdramatic.  I guess some people like drama.  That is why soap operas are so popular.

[Free2be]

Do not let me get in the way of your repeated ongoing not-love-fests.  But don't turn it around as if it isn't coming from you who " are tired of them", etc., etc. whatever you wish to call those feelings coming from inside yourselves.

Lame try but hey, self-reflection especially where there is a group, is highly unlikely.

[Isobel Archer]

Well if you want to talk about influencing the unhinged - how about calling the RF racist, insisting that they deliberately and continually  "fed you to the wolves" and refused to allow you to seek help when you told them you were suicidal.

How might that impact theats to the RF?

Or even - how is this all affecting the Coronation?  I just read that many stars - who were only to glad to perform for the Royals before - are now refusing - you know due to their racism, etc.

And as to claiming the monarchy is done - or should be - some of these same folks continue to extol "Duchess Meghan"  Oprah - when she first contributed to Clevr wrote:

“On the first day of Christmas my neighbor ‘M’ sent to me… A basket of deliciousness!” She added, not so subtly, “Yes that M” — alongside a crown emoji.

So interesting that Meghan's "royalty" is to be always celebrated, but the RF themselves should just go away.

[Free2be]

I recommend reading a very complete article in Rolling Stone: 

Snubbing the King: Why Don’t Big Stars Want to Perform at Charles’ Coronation?

About the Christmas gift, that was over 3 years ago, Harry and Meaghan had moved to Montecito 4 months earlier, she sent the gift to Oprah and Oprah didn't call her a Duchess, she did use the emoji.  Sue her, I guess.  Oprah had more recently expressed hope that the family would find healing, I had read nothing about her wishing the monarchy to end.  Making mountains our of moehills is what tabloids do.

[sugar plum]

Haters definition:

"A person who greatly dislikes a specified person or thing".

"INFORMAL -
A negative or critical person".

[lgfan]

@sugar plum 

"Haters definition:

"A person who greatly dislikes a specified person or thing".

"INFORMAL -
A negative or critical person"."

That definition can also apply to the Harry and Meghan supporters who criticize other posters who do not agree with them.

[sugar plum]

I respectfully disagree. We're not hating on posters, at least I'm not. It's the behavior we don't understand. There's a difference between the two.

[lgfan]

Sugar plum it is fine if you disagree but I still stand by what I said.