Suggestion Box

[JazzyGirl]

I know many won't agree with me on this topic, but.....

Why is it necessary to have two hosts presenting a product, plus the product host, and then another "special" host (i.e., Mallie, Dennis Basso, etc.).  This is truly overkill.  Honestly, QVC administrators, if we, the customer, want to buy something, we will.  But please stop the overkill.  Just my opinion.

[kaydee50]

@JazzyGirl  Agree.  If QVC survives, I see AI taking over the "hosting" duties.  Would be a big money saver, I think.

[TheMemphisVette]

i have no issues with this

and the perceived savings of having less is not accurate

[ellaphant]

Qs president has described Q as "retail and entertainment." Corporate obviously likes the dancing, yelling and singing. 

[snipsnapsnur]

---

@TheMemphisVette wrote:

i have no issues with this

and the perceived savings of having less is not accurate

---

How so?  Do you have the information that proves that?  Seems like if you're only paying one host and one vendor, Q would be saving quite a bit of money?

[jlkz]

@JazzyGirl 

Welcome to the forum.  

I understand the logic of your comments; however, you need to direct your words on paper / email to the Corporate Officers rather than to us wee posters for results.  They are the powers that be...

[icezeus]

---

@snipsnapsnur wrote:

---

@TheMemphisVette wrote:

i have no issues with this

and the perceived savings of having less is not accurate

---

How so?  Do you have the information that proves that?  Seems like if you're only paying one host and one vendor, Q would be saving quite a bit of money?

---

@snipsnapsnur 

I would assume that the hosts are salaried employees. Therefore, there are no savings for having fewer hosts. 

[willomenia]

---

@JazzyGirl wrote:

I know many won't agree with me on this topic, but.....

Why is it necessary to have two hosts presenting a product, plus the product host, and then another "special" host (i.e., Mallie, Dennis Basso, etc.).  This is truly overkill.  Honestly, QVC administrators, if we, the customer, want to buy something, we will.  But please stop the overkill.  Just my opinion.

---

Probably because not one host lately prepares for the show they have. They need two so one can help the other do the job one host used to be able to handle. Now the have to dance and tell stupid stories that are useless

[Tori3569]

---

@icezeus wrote:

---

@snipsnapsnur wrote:

---

@TheMemphisVette wrote:

i have no issues with this

and the perceived savings of having less is not accurate

---

How so?  Do you have the information that proves that?  Seems like if you're only paying one host and one vendor, Q would be saving quite a bit of money?

---

@snipsnapsnur 

I would assume that the hosts are salaried employees. Therefore, there are no savings for having fewer hosts. 

---

Definitely!  In no possible world would the QVC hosts be hourly employees.  Therefore, they will be paid the same no matter how many hours they work.  

[We rescue cats]

If QVC needs to save money the first thing they should cut is payroll. Two or more people presenting an item is a waste of money, and if a vendor wants to send a sales person take advantage of it and save the $$$$ unless the presenter job is a union job.