Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 36,947
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Grammatically speaking

[ Edited ]

@achat Please do not listen to any news program.  You will need to call 911. 

 

That ship has "sail-ed."  Didn't you know as soon as people started saying "text-ed" that it would happen?

Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,389
Registered: ‎02-07-2011

And "fabrication" instead of "fabric."  I guess they think they sound intelligent using bigger words but it is quite the opposite!

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,755
Registered: ‎02-22-2015

LW often says, "Me and Xxxxx blah, blah, blah."  I cringe each time. She should know it is "Xxxxx and I blah, blah, blah."   LW has been working and selling in communications for decades and certainly should know better.

Yet, she also say, "Yeah" and "I know" (to herself) all of the time. Why? To use up air time? IDK. It drives me crazy. 

Money screams; wealth whispers.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,765
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@CalminHeart -

I do think its ok to talk about all the different ways people express things and why though.

And @PamfromCT , that is so trueSmiley Happy

 

"If you walk the footsteps of a stranger, you'll learn things you never knew. Can you sing with all the voices of the mountains? can you paint with all the colors of the wind?"
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,243
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

I Googled the difference as as expected a difference of opinion.  In  my view... so what...?? we are watching to get product information not worry about misuse or misunderstanding or difference in usage.  

 

 

 

Does less and fewer mean the same thing?
However, it's not that simple . Since the reign of Alfred the Great, a time when Old English was spoken, less has been used in the same way that fewer is currently used. This long history of usage accounts for supermarkets posting the words "10 Items or Less" over the express lanes, when "10 Items or Fewer" is the grammatically correct option.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,970
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

@banned again wrote:

@on the bay wrote:

Did you mean to say that scholars of English do not care about the  structure and form of English?

That doesn't seem to make sense?


I stopped reading it there. Didn't make sense and use of capitalization was rude.


Fascinating to me that capitalization is perceived as "rude". I'd happily italicize, but for a number of reasons, and in the interest of more rapid communication i action, I DO use caps for emphasis.

 

The concept of rudeness/emphasis and its dichotomy is VERY recent in the spectrum of written communication, and a PERFECT example of the ever changing use of verbal communication in action, both written AND spoken, as both a tool and an art.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 20,126
Registered: ‎04-28-2010

I'm a grammatic 'mess', and I could use a few lessons.  

 

It's been a long, long time.  

 

I ran across two grammar lesson hand-booklets, and might sit down and review. 

'More or less', 'Right or wrong', 'In general', and 'Just thinking out loud ' (as usual).
Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,510
Registered: ‎05-23-2010

@D Kay wrote:

How do you "measure" love and hate? (as stated in the post)


@D Kay @Your question is important. When it comes to the word fewer, it should be used for things that can be counted. When it comes to the word less, it should be used for things that can not be counted. Measurements are not the only instances that call for the word less to be used. 

Frequent Contributor
Posts: 111
Registered: ‎11-08-2010

Not sure I care.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 23,835
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

The vendors often use terrible language.  I have heard several say that such and such beauty products contain "NO ICKY STUFF"..... No that is so vey descriptive  and helpful👎