Microwaving food does NOT change its DNA. That is ridiculous. I suggest you look at where some of the info you linked as sources comes from. The Telegraph UK, The Future of things.com? I cannot believe you scoff at scientific research but will accept an article written by a guy (Chet Day) who is self employed and this is part of his write up on LinkedIn :Writes novels, stories, screenplays, essays, satire, parody, songs, and anything else that I feel compelled to throw words at. The American Cancer Society says they are safe and does not cause cancer. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/medicaltreatments/radiation-exposure-and...
Natural News is one of the most dangerous and conspiracy theory filled sites there is. They are big in the anti-vaccine movement. Surgical oncologist David Gorski called the site "one of the most wretched hives of scum and quackery on the Internet," and the most "blatant purveyor of the worst kind of quackery and paranoid anti-physician and anti-medicine conspiracy theories anywhere on the Internet".[16] Peter Bowditch of the website Ratbags,[17] and Jeff McMahon writing for Forbes commented about the site.[18] Steven Novella of NeuroLogica Blog called NaturalNews "a crank alt med site that promotes every sort of medical nonsense imaginable. If it is unscientific, antiscientific, conspiracy-mongering, or downright silly, Mike Adams appears to be all for it – whatever sells the "natural" products he hawks on his site."[4]
Individuals who commented about Adams' website include astronomer and blogger Phil Plait,[19] PZ Myers,[20] and Mark Hoofnagle.[9] Brian Dunning listed it as #1 on his "Top 10 Worst Anti-Science Websites" list.[21] Adams is listed as a "promoter of questionable methods" by Quackwatch.[22] Robert T. Carroll at The Skeptic's Dictionary said, "Natural News is not a very good source for information. If you don't trust me on this, go to Respectful Insolence or any of the other bloggers on ScienceBlogs and do a search for "Natural News" or "Mike Adams" (who is NaturalNews). Hundreds of entries will be found and not one of them will have a good word to say about Mike Adams as a source."[23]
After Patrick Swayze's death in 2009, Adams posted an article in which he remarked that Swayze, in dying, "joins many other celebrities who have been recently killed by pharmaceuticals or chemotherapy."[24] Commentators of Adams' article on Patrick Swayze included bloggers such as David Gorski[25] and Phil Plait, the latter of whom called Adams' commentary "obnoxious and loathsome."[26] When Angelina Jolie underwent a double mastectomy in May 2013 because she had the BRCA1 gene, Adams stated that "Countless millions of women carry the BRCA1 gene and never express breast cancer because they lead healthy, anti-cancer lifestyles based on smart nutrition, exercise, sensible sunlight exposure and avoidance of cancer-causing chemicals."[27] Gorski called the article "vile" and noted that Adams had written similarly themed articles about the death of Michael Jackson, Tony Snow, and Tim Russert.[28]
In 2014, Brian Palmer, writing in the Daily Herald of Arlington Heights, Illinois, criticized the site's promotion of alternative medicine treatments, such as bathing in Himalayan salt and eating Hijiki seaweed, and referred to the claims NaturalNews made about their efficacy as "preposterous."[29]
Shawn Lawrence Otto mentions the site, specifically its discussion of the Vioxx controversy, in his list of references in his book Fool Me Twice, and New York Times reporter Christopher Kelly has mentioned Adams' endorsement of Jim Marrs' books.[30]
This site is dangerous and to believe one single thing they have to say is even more dangerous!
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK
Blogs & Forums
Forums
Blogs
