Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,997
Registered: ‎03-12-2010
On 1/24/2014 Opurrra said: Just as you admit the 16 inch is too small why cant she say something is too big? Big..the opposite of small!

I couldn't clasp a 16" necklace, hence it is too small for me to wear. She may PREFER an 18" length, but can wear a 20" also. Her dress was so low she could have worn a 30-some inch.

Saying 20" is too big was nutty. And it was her manner, not just what she said. Scroll down!

She kept mumbling about the models and some necklace being just too big. I don't even know what she meant.

It was as if she was becoming more agitated at not having an 18" when the 20" worked just fine too.

Hyacinth {#emotions_dlg.blink}

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,997
Registered: ‎03-12-2010
On 1/25/2014 Tweena63 said:
On 1/25/2014 jk9 said: Sounds like a lot of hypercritical bunk to me. So Lisa said something was too big.......just her thought about the length of the necklace. Why over analyze her words?
If you will read the original post the words ""too big"" was repeated 4 times. That was the original reason why I commented as I did. So it was not over analyzed but a fact.

Lisa must have repeated ""too big"" 20 times!! That's why I noticed it!

Hyacinth

Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,100
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I didn't witness a hissy fit during the presentation. (I saw it, too.)

There is one going on here.{#emotions_dlg.lol}