Fashion

[Susan in California]

@MaggieMack

I am always on the lookout for good leggings.  But I don't care for

camo or lines down the side or zippers.  I also check fabric content,

and in all fairness, it does seem Logo has primarily cotton leggings.

I have also stated before she has very nice colors.  But the very

simple leggings do sell out.  One day, I do plan to try them.  Thanks

for the recommendation.  More importantly, thank you for being a

very thoughtful poster who refrains from attacking others. We all

could take a page out of your book, I believe.

[MaggieMack]

@Susan in California, when you're ready to make the plunge, I would recommend starting with A236704, $49.75, 90% cotton, 10% spandex. Still available in a few colors, a very popular legging. No bagging at the end of the day, just flattering. A dream to wear.

[Susan in California]

Thanks @MaggieMack, I will try those leggings. The reviews are very good.

[QVCPhobe]

Logo clothes are fine.  The only issue that I have are increasing prices.  I do not make many purchases in th line anymore.

[Innovabead]

I agree.  Logo fashions are becoming more expensive for rayon-spandex material than other designers.  I find myself looking elsewhere for similar styles.  I've even gone to eBay for Logo items.   Lori might reconsider charging $70 for a cardigan or $65 for a top.

[jewel3]

I just paid more than $300 for a viscose/elastase knit dress. European names for rayon/spandex. Although it is heavier and a better quality weight, it is still the same basic fabric as a $45 dress or $60 tunic on the Q. 

It it is beautiful and I would love it if the Q offered some finer fabrics but the cost would be so much more. 

[September13]

I don't think there is a problem.  I, too, am tired of LOGO fashions being shoved down our throats.  There isn't a day goes by that a LOGO show is not in the schedule.

I, too, would like to know why something like that is supposed to be so popular.

I always ask others, "Can you see youself wearing that to the PTO meeting or the softball field?"

American dressing has become very casual and that is fine, but adding chiffon or strange back or side panels just makes her clothing weird.

Why shouldn't a shopper be able to speak her mind and let QVC and Ms. Goldstein know that this line is not one everyone is comfortable with.

I think many of the show hosts and models look terrible in LOGO fashions and we all know that those women are fit, buff and (except for a couple of them) a size 2.

Many years ago, I wrote to QVC and asked them to stop referring to the "little black dress". I asked that they substitute "classic black dress" since not all of us have a little black dress and the hosts saying "Just thow this on with your litle black dress" is very depressing for those of us who have never been as thin as they are. (I did wear a 12 when I got married 33 years ago, but time and gravity are no friends of any woman.)

The powers that be did nothing about it and so we still hear about that famous yet fictional "little black dress"

Thirty five percent of the current adult population are considered obese. That should tell the hosts and designers what women want and need.  The problem is that they don't pay attention.

But how can they if those who would like to communicate dissatifaction are told to just suck it up and stay quiet?

[September13]

I never had.  But then, I don't watch "Shark Tank".

[sstoo]

Lori, please consider offering the polka dot tank that has three colors in it separately. (TSV a week or two ago with the roses sweater). Thank you!