Fashion

[Caaareful Shopper]

I like some Logo items, but I'm surprised how the collaboration with Smiley World seems a total miss -- at least in the jeans A612755.

It was a risky collab anyway.  But the sequins in the jeans leaves the smiley face nearly unrecognizable.  I see they have already been marked down by $30 compared to the original price.  

The Smiley Face is practically hidden the tie dye top A612752.  Marked down by $25.

It's like Where's Waldo?

[Kachina624]

I wondered at the wisdom of this collaboration when it was introduced a few weeks ago.  The Smiley Face seems to be an icon of the past with not a lot of interest in it nowdays.  Seems like it was mostly seen on children's  clothing.   Who did they think was going to buy it, I wonder?

[soozer]

"swing, and a miss". ..... Not smiling 

[chrystaltree]

Nothing ventured,  nothing gained.

[phoenixbrd]

I liked LOGO before they sold out.

[ALRATIBA]

Kind of gimmickry - nothing I would consider wearing.

[ManyMeows]

😂 What's next ...... The rebirth of the Garanimals line? 

[Caaareful Shopper]

---

@ALRATIBA wrote:
Kind of gimmickry - nothing I would consider wearing.

---

@ALRATIBA  Agreed.  I might have purchased the grey color patch smiley jeans for a fun look.  But in the end it wasn't worth the added design that you can barely see, even for fun.

[Elf ish]

I always did think LOGO resembled "little girl" dressing so Garanimals does seem appropriate.  I Never buy LOGO or watch her presentation but have seen George (her other presenter) and think his style is great and age appropriate.

[ROMARY]

Not so crazy about those jean's patches, but I do like most (if not all) of LOGO Smiley items.  Tops, etc.

Jeans with Smiley without the large patches would appeal to me.