Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
12-12-2015 12:17 AM
It is AMD. They don't mention that. AMD is a cheap processor and the reason the package is so cheap. You get what you pay for.
I would only buy Intel.
12-12-2015 12:34 AM
Gosh! I've had super good luck with AMD processors!
12-12-2015 12:46 AM
I think the Intel vs AMD question lies with what a user wants to do on their pc. AMD may be less expensive, but I don't think it's "cheap." I've had both & they both worked fine for me. I don't do any gaming, & mostly use my pc for emailing, storing personal documents, internet searches.
12-12-2015 02:39 AM
There is no reason not to buy a computer because it has an AMD and not Intel processor, Now depending on how one uses their system, they might want a specific processor. AMD makes some that can handle high graphical content gaming better than those from Intel.
I personally would be concerned about other specs that are important to me, for my use, than the brand name of the processor. It's specs? Yes! Intel or AMD? No.
hckynut(john)
12-12-2015 05:45 AM - edited 12-12-2015 07:35 AM
@hckynutjohn wrote:There is no reason not to buy a computer because it has an AMD and not Intel processor, Now depending on how one uses their system, they might want a specific processor. AMD makes some that can handle high graphical content gaming better than those from Intel.
I personally would be concerned about other specs that are important to me, for my use, than the brand name of the processor. It's specs? Yes! Intel or AMD? No.
hckynut(john)
I agree. I've owned computers having both processors at one tme or the other and I couldn't tell the difference. I use my computer for more than e-mail and shopping and the performance was fine.
There is more to a computer's performance than just the processor. It's a combination of processor, RAM, video card/chip, audio and hard drive space. You can have the best processor but if you don't have enough RAM, your computer will run slow. I read the specs and I think for the average user, this computer is a good deal.
12-12-2015 05:55 AM
@hckynutjohn wrote:There is no reason not to buy a computer because it has an AMD and not Intel processor, Now depending on how one uses their system, they might want a specific processor. AMD makes some that can handle high graphical content gaming better than those from Intel.
I personally would be concerned about other specs that are important to me, for my use, than the brand name of the processor. It's specs? Yes! Intel or AMD? No.
hckynut(john)
I agree with you, John. Actually, I agree with both you and glb, too. The overall specs are what are important. You (as in "anyone") have to add everything up when you are looking at a computer. You shouldn't just be focusing on the processor alone.
I have said this before too in other posts. I have used both kinds of processors in other computers, and have not been able to notice a difference. They both were fine-both the AMD processor, and the Intel processor. I don't think that the average computer-user is going to notice a difference, either.
12-12-2015 07:53 AM
I also agree. You won't see any meaningful difference between similar AMD and Intel processors. Now if you're comparing a dual core AMD running at 2.5 mHz to an eight core Intel running at 4.5 mHz then yeah, you'll see a difference, just you would if you flipped the two, but an AMD and Intel processor running in the same speed range with the same number of cores will perform virtually identically.
12-12-2015 09:18 AM
Thank all who are giving us specific info. I use my computer for very little, so even though it has less versatility than many, it's already more than I need.
I don't save pictures, I don't play games (solitaire really doesn'ty count as a game), I don't listen to music or download music, I rarely even download a recipe.
"Lesser" computers work just fine for those of us who surf a bit, read and write emails, and pay a few bills.
My cheapie laptop is fast reaching the average age for all laptops, so I know it might need to be replaced soon. I certainly am someone who will check specifications, but I also know there's no reason for me to buy top of the line. I can afford to, but it makes absolutely no sense to me to do that.
12-12-2015 10:49 AM
12-12-2015 11:29 AM
I'm not getting this because I want Intel. Also I don't want or need a printer. I would rather that money goes to getting the best computer I can and not bundling it with a printer I don't need. Now if you are in the market for a computer and printer this may be a good value for you.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788