Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
-
Blogs & Forums
-
Forums
-
Blogs
-
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
@Pearlee wrote:
@Lila Belle wrote:
@Pearlee wrote:
@Lila Belle wrote:
@Pearlee wrote:
@Greenhouse wrote:Their questions were meant to provoke candidates into sparring with each other.
Yes of course, because it's all about RATINGS for CNN.
Also, did you know that the debate was supposed to be 2 hrs. long but CNN realized they could get advertising money for more time so two days before the show it was made into a three-hour debate? (This according to Donald Trump). It's all about ratings and dollars. So of course CNN was interesting in instigating fights which would make for more viewer interest (to watch the entire show), good ratings, and more advertising dollars. Most of the questions posed were to Trump and Bush with Fiorina just butting in all the time interrupting to get air time; hardly any questions were asked of Huckabee, Walker (who is really boring), Cruz, or Kasich. Rand Paul a few more but not many. It's as if CNN didn't take the other candidates seriously. CNN knew what it was doing - exactly - and it worked.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
In respect to just asking a few questions of the low polling candidates FNC did the same thing. It worked for them as well.
@Lila Belle First of all, I was sticking to the subject of this thread.
Second, Foxnews didn't do it nearly as much or as badly as CNN did. If you look at the stats for time spent on each candidate on the Foxnews debate, except for Trump which way ahead of others got the most air time, the air time stats are much closer than last night's for each candidate. Really, go look it up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LOL
Interesting response to the truth. You must not have looked up the facts.
..................................................................................
Pearley, I'm over your MO. And I'm probably not the only one.
@HappyDaze wrote:
@NoelSeven wrote:I'm surprised people don't know them by sight, they're all in the news frequently. It's important to know who is who.
Not all of us watch or listen to the news on a regular basis. I hate the news- it is all negative for the most part. And if we don't live in or near the states some of these candidates are from then why would we know them intimately?
There are only a few I am not familar with- know their names but not always sure which is which.
Again, I am surprised at all the politic shaming.
And those asking us who aren't able to recite each candidates by name, face, stance on all issues, etc not to vote must be from one of the parties worried about losing next year...lol
Thank You! And for those of us who live on the West Coast, we get home after the time the debates begin, so we miss all the intros. Then we get to catch bits and snippets while we check our messages and start and eat our dinner. I have tried to watch most of both debates, and I still can't ID each of these people. Names in front of them, in any way, would be helpful. This isn't a difficult thing to do!
@september wrote:
@HappyDaze wrote:
@NoelSeven wrote:I'm surprised people don't know them by sight, they're all in the news frequently. It's important to know who is who.
Not all of us watch or listen to the news on a regular basis. I hate the news- it is all negative for the most part. And if we don't live in or near the states some of these candidates are from then why would we know them intimately?
There are only a few I am not familar with- know their names but not always sure which is which.
Again, I am surprised at all the politic shaming.
And those asking us who aren't able to recite each candidates by name, face, stance on all issues, etc not to vote must be from one of the parties worried about losing next year...lol
Thank You! And for those of us who live on the West Coast, we get home after the time the debates begin, so we miss all the intros. Then we get to catch bits and snippets while we check our messages and start and eat our dinner. I have tried to watch most of both debates, and I still can't ID each of these people. Names in front of them, in any way, would be helpful. This isn't a difficult thing to do!
Exactly!
@HappyDaze wrote:
@NoelSeven wrote:I'm surprised people don't know them by sight, they're all in the news frequently. It's important to know who is who.
Not all of us watch or listen to the news on a regular basis. I hate the news- it is all negative for the most part. And if we don't live in or near the states some of these candidates are from then why would we know them intimately?
There are only a few I am not familar with- know their names but not always sure which is which.
Again, I am surprised at all the politic shaming.
And those asking us who aren't able to recite each candidates by name, face, stance on all issues, etc not to vote must be from one of the parties worried about losing next year...lol
*******************************************************
I will thank you not to address me when you are ranting about someone telling you not to vote, because it wasn't me.
Footer Navigation and Information
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Manage Your Account
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Get More with QCard®
Enjoy 12+ VIP Savings Events a year (& more!).
Work with Us
Stay Connected
Download Our QVC Apps
This is Shopping Brought to Life.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788