Community Chat

[olivia1123]

unjust squared!

[Heiress-inFL]

On 1/24/2014 JaneMarple said:

On 1/24/2014 Peaches McPhee said:

Just.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. (Assuming the judge is right, and the donor did not follow Kansas law.)

But it's not a law that would be familiar to the average person.

No excuse. The average person should educate themselves, or retain an attorney if they're venturing into this kind of territory. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, especially in something this life changing and important.

[JaneMarple]

On 1/24/2014 croemer said:

btw Jane: w have to stop meeting up like this.

I know before long, rumors may start.

[mgm2]

unfair

I feel badly for the child.

[Cakers1]

Craig's list???

Well where did he "donate"? I know "how" he donated but if he didn't go to a doctor/clinic - then how did the couple end up using his "donation" to have a child?

I don't know what the Kansas law says - more info is needed to form an opinion, but right now I'd say unfair.

If the couple had not applied for assistance, he would not have been made to dole out child support. I don't look at him as a deadbeat dad in this situation, and that's what he would be labeled had this not been a "donation" case, no matter who had the baby.

[raven-blackbird]

On 1/24/2014 JaneMarple said:

On 1/24/2014 blackbirdraven said:

I think if you're going to father a baby........you do just that.......in every sense........or cents in this case..................................raven

He thought he was just being a donor, nothing else.

I don't care.......look there are more sides to this then "just being a donor"............I don't think anyone should, unless they plan to parent that child to adulthood........I also think it's a dangerous practice......bringing a child into the world is a BIG decision....every person on the face of this planet has a right to know their biological parents........their history........every child needs a mother and a father.....................raven

[Topaz Gem]

Completely unfair.

[Cakers1]

**

[JaneMarple]

On 1/24/2014 Heiress-inFL said:

On 1/24/2014 JaneMarple said:

On 1/24/2014 Peaches McPhee said:

Just.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse. (Assuming the judge is right, and the donor did not follow Kansas law.)

But it's not a law that would be familiar to the average person.

No excuse. The average person should educate themselves, or retain an attorney if they're venturing into this kind of territory. Ignorance of the law is no excuse, especially in something this life changing and important.

Take a look on this side of it HIF; Suppose the ladies are medium income and couldn't afford to go to a sperm bank, what then hire a john? The man thought he was doing the right thing by the ladies, its TOTALLY THEIR RESPONSIBILITY!

[JaneMarple]

On 1/24/2014 Cakers1 said:

Also - I thought this ""donation"" type was confidential. How did the couple know him???

The ladies solicited on Craigs List.