Reply
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,342
Registered: ‎10-13-2011

I think they are very masculine looking and look awful on most females. I have very tiny bones, and they totally overwhelm my wrist. Even on women with larger bones, I still think they look masculine.

I do not want to see us go back to the tiny watch faces of the latter half of the 20th century, but there needs to be a happy medium.

Like all fads, I think they will run their course...hopefully soon.

Some people do drugs. I do shoes....Celine Dion
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,559
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

I love this look of offsetting a large watch with a delicate bracelet. Good excuse to buy some new bracelets to go with my watches.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 9,835
Registered: ‎03-09-2010
That's a nice look, Free, and I'd wear that watch with a little Brighton charm bracelet I have. I started this thread, and I was thinking of watches that are larger than the one in your photo.
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,517
Registered: ‎09-18-2014

I love that look, Free, and it's one I wear often.

I have very small wrists and big watches don't overwhelm me at all

~Enough is enough~
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,048
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I own two watches: an Ebel two-tone with a white face and a Raymond Weil with a black leather band, gold face, and pave diamond bezel. Both are women's watches and are a good size for my wrist. I don't think a large watch would look good on my wrist, as I prefer an understated, classic look. That said, I dislike women's watches with tiny faces (like the one I wore in the 1980s). To me, those look very dated.

Super Contributor
Posts: 1,835
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

i love big watches! i have several of the MK. i one with the leather band and have been stalking ebay for it for months! but then i have always worn men's watches. the only ladies watch i have is a diamond one that i have had for years and bought because i loved the look of it.