Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
‎03-04-2015 02:52 PM
I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
‎03-04-2015 03:17 PM
He's probably bored out of his mind in Russia. No good TV, probably doesn't understand the language well, isn't privy to any Russian secrets like he was here, lousy food, no sports teams that he's interested in.
(All said with tongue in cheek, but it's probably true to a certain extent). In other words, he probably has a new appreciation for his former country that he did so much damage to. I don't feel sorry for him.
‎03-04-2015 04:29 PM
On 3/4/2015 Ford1224 said:I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
I think you have a point. I'd assume that what he leaked would have to come out, if only to dissect it to see how sensitive the material was.
Isn't that when they do a military trial? So the info can stay in-house?
‎03-04-2015 09:32 PM
‎03-04-2015 09:37 PM
I think he should come back to face trial. FYI I don't feel a certain way either way and really didn't follow it enough and am just speaking on what I know.
BUT I have a journalist family member (through marriage), who agrees with Snowden.
‎03-04-2015 10:39 PM
On 3/4/2015 Jerri E said: Let him stay there. He made his choice by moving country to country, seeking asylum. No welcome mat need be rolled out here for him.I ITA....he went to Russia of his own free will.....he should stay there
‎03-04-2015 10:46 PM
On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Ford1224 said:I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
I think you have a point. I'd assume that what he leaked would have to come out, if only to dissect it to see how sensitive the material was.
Isn't that when they do a military trial? So the info can stay in-house?
My granddad was an army JAG and it might not necessarily be able to stay in house due to the notoriety of the case.
‎03-04-2015 10:51 PM
On 3/4/2015 Lila Belle said:Thanks, Lila! Maybe it would also depend on the sensitivity of what he released.On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Ford1224 said:I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
I think you have a point. I'd assume that what he leaked would have to come out, if only to dissect it to see how sensitive the material was.
Isn't that when they do a military trial? So the info can stay in-house?
My granddad was an army JAG and it might not necessarily be able to stay in house due to the notoriety of the case.
‎03-04-2015 11:04 PM
On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Lila Belle said:Thanks, Lila! Maybe it would also depend on the sensitivity of what he released.On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Ford1224 said:I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
I think you have a point. I'd assume that what he leaked would have to come out, if only to dissect it to see how sensitive the material was.
Isn't that when they do a military trial? So the info can stay in-house?
My granddad was an army JAG and it might not necessarily be able to stay in house due to the notoriety of the case.
The governments involved probably already knew what was released and there really wasn't much of an uproar, except here. He'll become an example of what not to do. That's jmo.
‎03-04-2015 11:09 PM
On 3/4/2015 Lila Belle said:I hope he does become an example of what not to do.On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Lila Belle said:Thanks, Lila! Maybe it would also depend on the sensitivity of what he released.On 3/4/2015 NoelSeven said:On 3/4/2015 Ford1224 said:I think there's a lot we still don't know. Putting him on trial could backfire on some very important people. I don't know all the facts, but it's a krap shoot for me. My opinion right now is I don't care either way. The damage has been done.
I think you have a point. I'd assume that what he leaked would have to come out, if only to dissect it to see how sensitive the material was.
Isn't that when they do a military trial? So the info can stay in-house?
My granddad was an army JAG and it might not necessarily be able to stay in house due to the notoriety of the case.
The governments involved probably already knew what was released and there really wasn't much of an uproar, except here. He'll become an example of what not to do. That's jmo.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved.  | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788