Community Chat

[Porcelain]

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

---

@Cakers3 wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

"by 2100" - that's 80 years from now. Things will be a lot better by then but not because of low greenhouse gases, etc.

---

@ThinkingOutLoud   You have no idea if things will be a lot better by then.

Anymore than I can say things will be a lot worse by then.

---

 I stand by what I said. Wish these boards allowed more explanation.

---

Well we'll all be dead by then.

[Cakers3]

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

---

@Cakers3 wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

"by 2100" - that's 80 years from now. Things will be a lot better by then but not because of low greenhouse gases, etc.

---

@ThinkingOutLoud   You have no idea if things will be a lot better by then.

Anymore than I can say things will be a lot worse by then.

---

 I stand by what I said. Wish these boards allowed more explanation.

---

@ThinkingOutLoud   You POV is fine, it is how you are viewing the topic.

I have a feeling where you might be going based on your wish for the boards to allow more explanation.

I think I get it.

Anyway, I thought the stats were interesting based on the posts regarding climate change and the horrific tragedy in FL right now.

I didn't want to detract from those threads so I started this one.

It's all good.

[ThinkingOutLoud]

---

@Porcelain wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

---

@Cakers3 wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

"by 2100" - that's 80 years from now. Things will be a lot better by then but not because of low greenhouse gases, etc.

---

@ThinkingOutLoud   You have no idea if things will be a lot better by then.

Anymore than I can say things will be a lot worse by then.

---

 I stand by what I said. Wish these boards allowed more explanation.

---

Well we'll all be dead by then.

---

Nope

[Porcelain]

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

---

@Porcelain wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

---

@Cakers3 wrote:

---

@ThinkingOutLoud wrote:

"by 2100" - that's 80 years from now. Things will be a lot better by then but not because of low greenhouse gases, etc.

---

@ThinkingOutLoud   You have no idea if things will be a lot better by then.

Anymore than I can say things will be a lot worse by then.

---

 I stand by what I said. Wish these boards allowed more explanation.

---

Well we'll all be dead by then.

---

Nope

---

Oh, I get it now. Good luck with that! I've never heard of Armageddon offered as a solution to rising oceans or climate change. You learn something new every day.

[hckynut]

Uh Huh!  Global or country problem?  If the former, might look towards India and China. Every study has a counter study, I however am not interested enough to spend my time looking. 

hckynut 

[Sooner]

MY how facts come and go!  Especially "scientific" ones.

When I was in school we were concerned about THE COMING ICE AGE!  It was on the front cover of Time Magazine.  That alone making it a fact, does it not? The theory was advanced from scientific findings and it was certain.

Somehow I missed it.  

[Drythe]

---

@agb80 wrote:

No matter what the U.S. does it will be negated by India and China.  Not much we can do about that.  

---

@agb80 

As the ‘leading industrial’ nation,

I think we should lead the way, rather than find/make excuses.

[candyagain]

---

@Drythe wrote:

---

@agb80 wrote:

No matter what the U.S. does it will be negated by India and China.  Not much we can do about that.  

---

@agb80 

As the ‘leading industrial’ nation,

I think we shoud lead the way, rather than find/make excuses.

---

Think it's China now. Ask them to lead the way.......

[Sooner]

---

@Drythe wrote:

---

@agb80 wrote:

No matter what the U.S. does it will be negated by India and China.  Not much we can do about that.  

---

@agb80 

As the ‘leading industrial’ nation,

I think we shoud lead the way, rather than find/make excuses.

---

@Drythe LEAD China and India?  Well, see how that works out for us. . . 

[Drythe]

---

@Sooner wrote:

---

@Drythe wrote:

---

@agb80 wrote:

No matter what the U.S. does it will be negated by India and China.  Not much we can do about that.  

---

@agb80 

As the ‘leading industrial’ nation,

I think we should lead the way, rather than find/make excuses.

---

@Drythe LEAD China and India?  Well, see how that works out for us. . . 

---

@Sooner 

While you and I disagree on many points, no need to intentionally mis-state my comments.  They ARE as valid as yours.

We may see indeed as to how doing nothing ourselves about this issue works out.  I believe our country should indeed lead the way in betterment.