Reply
Highlighted
Valued Contributor
Posts: 977
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 biancardi said:
On 3/19/2014 Topaz Gem said:

Ford started a similar thread last week about being "Exhausted by the coverage..." and many agreed with her, and no one brought up Fox News. I guess it really DOES matter who starts a thread... {#emotions_dlg.rolleyes}

I didn't see or comment on Ford's thread.

and the OP mentioned CNN specifically and we ALL know that bill o'reilly and charles kuarthammer(?) were complaining and moaning about the coverage on CNN

So, yeah, the OP DOES have an agenda here.

I mentioned CNN earlier, but that's because it's the channel i watch more than any other cable news channel, and where I saw most of the coverage. I finally just stopped watching CNN, and rely on my local news, and the NBC national news in the evening.
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,315
Registered: ‎09-15-2012

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

BRAVO!! *applause*

The OP has accomplished her mission.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 9,734
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 mgm2 said:

BRAVO!! *applause*

The OP has accomplished her mission.

*wink*

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,287
Registered: ‎01-24-2013

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 Topaz Gem said:
On 3/19/2014 Lila Belle said:

{#emotions_dlg.biggrin} Lauren Ashburn from Fox admitted the other day that when she wants the news she watches CNN.

That makes sense. Look at all the Fox haters that post on this forum...they claim to detest the station, yet they know every single word that is said and who said it, LOL. {#emotions_dlg.laugh}

How lame.

All the stupid stuff pundits, etc., say on tv and appearances can be found on the internet.

Super Contributor
Posts: 1,771
Registered: ‎01-09-2014

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

Mission? Agenda? Please. Cnn was criticized by the wall Street journal as well. You poor paranoid souls.
Super Contributor
Posts: 1,771
Registered: ‎01-09-2014

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 wookie said: I don't know what FOX NEWS is saying about the coverage. My post reflected my own opininion based on some of the repetitive and outlandish theories the use to fill air time.That by no means reflects a lack of interest on my part, and it doesn't mean I'm not heartsick for the families. I am. Very much.
Ita
Honored Contributor
Posts: 13,344
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 Lila Belle said:
On 3/19/2014 Topaz Gem said:
On 3/19/2014 Lila Belle said:

{#emotions_dlg.biggrin} Lauren Ashburn from Fox admitted the other day that when she wants the news she watches CNN.

That makes sense. Look at all the Fox haters that post on this forum...they claim to detest the station, yet they know every single word that is said and who said it, LOL. {#emotions_dlg.laugh}

How lame.

All the stupid stuff pundits, etc., say on tv and appearances can be found on the internet.

Meanwhile the plane is still missing, you cannot keep that many people hidden and quiet for this long unless they have been killed.

Also, is the plane going to be used for something sinister later like hitting another U.S. target? Let the pundits and the networks keep the coverage going. Fox, CNN even MSNBC just talk about those missing people.

"Live frugally, but love extravagantly."
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,287
Registered: ‎01-24-2013

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 Opurrra said: Mission? Agenda? Please. Cnn was criticized by the wall Street journal as well. You poor paranoid souls.

What do you expect ?

Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,921
Registered: ‎06-12-2013

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

On 3/19/2014 Lila Belle said:
On 3/19/2014 Opurrra said: Mission? Agenda? Please. Cnn was criticized by the wall Street journal as well. You poor paranoid souls.

What do you expect ?

Rupert Murdoch owns the WSJ.

Whoops.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 977
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Overkill coverage of plane

I think this argument is one that didn't have to happen.