@QueenDanceALotwrote:
@Highlands72wrote:
@QueenDanceALotwrote:
I watched a replay of the performance. Big deal over nothing. I didn't see any exposed boob, just the side of the left one when the top slipped a bit (I am amazed that it actually stayed on, and that she just skated on through it - good for her! She didn't want points deducted for stopping to fix it, they've worked so hard to get there).
And I only noticed the side of the left breast because it looked like she had a tattoo there.
Big stink over nothing. Just like the pearl clutching over their "next to nothing" costumes.
I don't like pearls, so therefore have none to clutch. I just think that the "next-to-nothing" outfits are impractical and not suitable for purpose, thereby creating unnecessary risk and distraction.
I don't wish to see the equivalent-- the male partner in a loincloth-- either-- and for the same reason.
I do agree, though, that the story has become a "big deal over nothing"-- no shocking exposure or anything to get worked up over. I feel the same way about the whole Janet Jackson thing years ago.
The only interesting thing about this whole dust-up is the distraction caused to the skater.
@Highlands72
I watched much of the ice dancing last night and sow none of the women wearing anything I would consider to be "next-to-nothing" or the equivalent of a man's loincloth.
@QueenDanceALot
When it comes to figure skating outfits, I have pretty much seen it all (yes, even loincloth-like garments); not so much in sanctioned competitions, but more often in shows and exhibitions. My grandmother was a competitive skater as a child in the 1930s and 40s. She remained active in the international skating community well into her 70s, in an organizational capacity. We bonded over many a skating event, even though I was not much of a skater.
More to the point under discussion: I borrowed the "next-to-nothing" phrase from your post; a better choice of words to convey my point would have been "flimsy," for the reasons I clearly stated-- impractical and distracting, not pearl-clutching shock. These flimsy costumes are prone to malfunction, and I have witnessed many a malfunction of this type over the years.
As an aside, I personally dislike the term "clutching pearls," as it rings of a not-so-subtle sexism in its insinuation that certain (women only) are overly sensitive and more prone to being shocked by events that might normally be considered standard behavior-- a milder form of "hysteria," so to speak. Is there a widely-used expression to convey a similar male reaction? Lest one might assume otherwise, I am not trying to be argumentative (just opinions, after all) or making any assumptions about your post; you could be the reincarnation of Elizabeth Cady Stanton for all I know.