Community Chat

[Tinkrbl44]

On 4/2/2015 Justina rae said:

If she had left that mess in the past I might not have had such a negative opinion of her. In my eyes she is playing the pitiable victim. I also cannot believe she has had such a difficult time getting a job especially if her credentials are true. I don't believe employers would hold her stupid mistake against her. Still I don't understand what makes her ""famous"" enough to be on The View. Is that what people are considering to be her claim to fame? Sad.

How is she ""playing the victim"" here? ..... Because she talks about her life?

[Vamp]

There is nothing that could get me to watch that show.

[scotttie]

On 4/2/2015 Free2be said:

On 4/2/2015 scotttie said:

On 4/2/2015 chickenbutt said:

On 4/2/2015 Lila Belle said:

She goes away for years at a time....

Easy to say ""just go out there and be amazing"". When your last name has become a verb in the national lexicon...perhaps not so easy to do.

That this happened says far more about us than about her.

Of course.

ETA: I was sticking up for her in case there is any doubt. :-)

[Noob1]

On 4/2/2015 Justina rae said:

If she had left that mess in the past I might not have had such a negative opinion of her. In my eyes she is playing the pitiable victim. I also cannot believe she has had such a difficult time getting a job especially if her credentials are true. I don't believe employers would hold her stupid mistake against her. Still I don't understand what makes her ""famous"" enough to be on The View. Is that what people are considering to be her claim to fame? Sad.

Maybe the view believes she has more experience in the oval office than Hillary. Whatever the case I wish her luck.

[KittyLouSoutenu]

On 4/2/2015 Vamp said:

There is nothing that could get me to watch that show.

I would totally watch it for a million dollars.

[RainCityGirl]

Yeah. Show me the money. I've seen her before on The View, only I didn't get paid.

[Love my grandkids]

#1, I can't abide that show. #2, she needs to get a real life and stop dredging up the past and move on. ML, you are old news, get over yourself.

[VioletEyes]

On 4/2/2015 scotttie said:

Again, haven't read this entire thread and so this comment is directed at nobody or any particular post.

What I want to comment is that the whole Lewinsky/Clinton episode was classic in exposing the hypocrisy of the "women's movement." Because Clinton was "their guy" what he did was fine and dandy and a "private matter". ROFLMBO!

For decades women campaigned (and rightly so!) for the right to not be harrassed in the workplace (and what he did with her would generally be considered *s* harrassment at any corporation in the country); and then *they* simply excuse it because of who he was. Yes SMH ever since.

The hypocrisy of the woman's movement? She was never harassed, in fact it was consensual.

[Melania]

On 4/2/2015 SoftRaindrops said:

On 4/2/2015 scotttie said:

Again, haven't read this entire thread and so this comment is directed at nobody or any particular post.

What I want to comment is that the whole Lewinsky/Clinton episode was classic in exposing the hypocrisy of the "women's movement." Because Clinton was "their guy" what he did was fine and dandy and a "private matter". ROFLMBO!

For decades women campaigned (and rightly so!) for the right to not be harrassed in the workplace (and what he did with her would generally be considered *s* harrassment at any corporation in the country); and then *they* simply excuse it because of who he was. Yes SMH ever since.

The hypocrisy of the woman's movement? She was never harassed, in fact it was consensual.

Ding!!!

[VioletEyes]

On 4/2/2015 Melania2 said:

On 4/2/2015 SoftRaindrops said:

On 4/2/2015 scotttie said:

Again, haven't read this entire thread and so this comment is directed at nobody or any particular post.

What I want to comment is that the whole Lewinsky/Clinton episode was classic in exposing the hypocrisy of the "women's movement." Because Clinton was "their guy" what he did was fine and dandy and a "private matter". ROFLMBO!

For decades women campaigned (and rightly so!) for the right to not be harrassed in the workplace (and what he did with her would generally be considered *s* harrassment at any corporation in the country); and then *they* simply excuse it because of who he was. Yes SMH ever since.

The hypocrisy of the woman's movement? She was never harassed, in fact it was consensual.

Ding!!!

Waving to Melania! Happy Easter....