On 12/28/2014 Ilikeshade said: On 12/26/2014 YorkieonmyPillow said: The local TV station here refuses to reveal the race of a suspect. They said it was their "policy" not to mention race----- even when there was a armed bank robbery with the suspect still at large.
PC gone mad. 
I've been asked a few times to give the race of a suspect to a police officer and it made me uncomfortable because when a witness is asked this, it's always their bias speaking...who they think it is instead of who it actually is. The first time I was asked I was around 18 years old and blurted out a race and immediately knew I was incorrect when I heard myself speak. It was then that I realized what was going on and I made the correction right away to the police. So, imo...it's okay to say what the color of someone's skin is when asked, without saying what race you think they are. Skin color is not necessarily an indicator of race.
I guess it's possible that a witness could be not accurate on race.
But there's a heck of a lot of difference in whether the person is very light in color or dark. Even an opinion has some merit.
In the example I gave, saying the armed robbers were a man and a woman was not helpful. If you gave a more thorough description, seeing a man and a woman in a 7-11 parking lot would cause me to look better if I could distinguish something about them. Also, that is not a common description in armed robberies. It also helps the public to protect themselves if THEY are in a parking lot. I might decide to stay in my car if I saw a couple like that described in the news report. Otherwise, you might find yourself in the middle of a robbery.
Another story recently had a surveillance video PHOTO of the armed robber. He has robbed banks that are located inside grocery stores. Some people have called "profiling" a dirty word. No, it's good common sense.
The public can be helpful in pointing law enforcement to criminals, and in some cases, we should have information to protect ourselves from them.
Hyacinth