Community Chat

[ROMARY]

occasional rain: Yes, ITA.

[ROMARY]

OMGoodness........I often watch retro Law and Order CI back-to-back two days/evenings a week.......and I'm guessing many people watch the more violent shows.

[occasionalrain]

On 3/28/2014 ROMARY said:

OMGoodness........I often watch retro Law and Order CI back-to-back two days/evenings a week.......and I'm guessing many people watch the more violent shows.

I know when trials are discussed here, many of us google all sorts of incriminating topics. I know I googled how to make chloroform during the Anthony trial.

I watch Snapped, Forensic Files, Law and Order CI and the British version when it's available On Demand.

[stilltamn8r]

Dang! we had an earthquake and we never got to see the end!

[MomOf4]

On 3/28/2014 stilltamn8r said:

Dang! we had an earthquake and we never got to see the end!

http://www.examiner.com/list/carol-kennedy-steven-democker-stockbroker-murder-trial

[LilacTree]

I don't think he did it. The tenant had a lot of issues with bad people, but he is dead. So the only one left to pin it on was the husband. These are all intelligent and educated people. I find it hard to believe he would murder his ex-wife for the insurance money, it just doesn't make sense. I hope he appeals and gets a more fair trial.

[occasionalrain]

On 3/29/2014 Ford1224 said:

I don't think he did it. The tenant had a lot of issues with bad people, but he is dead. So the only one left to pin it on was the husband. These are all intelligent and educated people. I find it hard to believe he would murder his ex-wife for the insurance money, it just doesn't make sense. I hope he appeals and gets a more fair trial.

From the beginning, the police didn't even consider the tenant but decided it was the ex-husband so any evidence pointing elsewhere they just disregarded.

[LilacTree]

On 3/29/2014 occasional rain said:

On 3/29/2014 Ford1224 said:

I don't think he did it. The tenant had a lot of issues with bad people, but he is dead. So the only one left to pin it on was the husband. These are all intelligent and educated people. I find it hard to believe he would murder his ex-wife for the insurance money, it just doesn't make sense. I hope he appeals and gets a more fair trial.

From the beginning, the police didn't even consider the tenant but decided it was the ex-husband so any evidence pointing elsewhere they just disregarded.

So the man was convicted based solely on the assumption that it must have been him because they could find no other suspects. Admirable.

[KatieB]

It seems like cops pick the one they want to pin the crime on and it seems that they get convicted no matter what. I don't think the husband killed her..

KatieB

[SydneyH]

I do believe the right person was convicted for this crime...........