Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,733
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I have a sense of where this is going. The multitude of accusations is going to cause a backlash. People will mock the whole thing.


~Who in the world am I? Ah, that's the great puzzle~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,010
Registered: ‎03-15-2014

I've long thought he was creepy.  His departure will be trouble for CBS This Morning, which had improved in recent years.  Sixty Minutes will hardly miss him - it has so many correspondents already, including Gayle King's friend Oprah.  And PBS will just put another show in his time slot.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,194
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Back in the fifties and sixties , my then husband and my girlfriends husbands were doing it at the get togethers.  In the 80s and 90s, still new husband and new girlfriends husbands grabbing a  feel when wives not looking.  I'm safe now, 81.

 

Now it's not harassement or s###al harrassment, it's being invisable .   Even the old coos who can barely walk, will try it if a young women is standing near him.

I did not like cheating husbands or s###al harrassment, but being admired in a good way was nice.

 

Boy, back in the day I could have been a millionaire with s###al harressment suits.  Especially in the work place.  I did sue a company in the 90's because I was being harasseded by a woman co worker.  I won the suit because I had lots of documentation. Dates, times and words and a paper trail.

 

I guess more big names will start coming out on the bandwagon.  Could not believe CR, but he's a man in power.  The little guy will not get exposed, just the ones in high power.              

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,448
Registered: ‎11-03-2013

Wonderful and spot on quote from Oliva Munn:

 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,266
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Seems to me that Sexual Harassment (maybe with a composite picture of Weinstein/Moore/Tambor/Rose) is a shoe in for Time Magazine 's Person(issue) of the year.  Reminds me of finger pointing of McCarthy hearings when I was a young child.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 36,947
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Charlie rose?

[ Edited ]

@Cakers3 wrote:

@Sooner wrote:

Excuse me here but it seems everyone that worked around the old creep knew what was going on and DID NOTHING about it.  There is a LOT of blame here to pass around.

 

He pranced around some woman nude and she kept working for him?  REALLY?

 

Sorry, but you are talking about the moral code at a whole work place here, not just the behavior of one man.  If you see a child abused and don't do anything about it, you are guilty.  

 

I think we need to examine the behavior and standards of an awful lot of people.  A LOT of people knew this stuff was going in many instances and accepted it as a fact.

 

Also, we are convicting people from accusations.  You can accuse a lot of people of a lot of things and ruin their lives.

 

Not taking up for the abusers here, but I am saying there is a far larger problem in this country than these named men.  The problem is that WE as a group have allowed them to do it, and often individuals have benefitted from the behavior, and they should be called out too.

 

So what are the standards?  Who is responsible for behvaior between individuals and in the workplace?  I think that is the REAL conversation here, and we aren't talking about that so much or at least I haven't seen it.  But I don't watch that much tv so maybe it is me. 

 

The crime is that we have allowed it. 


@Sooner  You have made some good points about others doing nothing about the abuser.


However, the blame rests squarely on the person who performed the act, not the victim.

 

I don't know how old you are, and it doesn't matter.  However I remember remarks made by a few crude male students in high school and there really wasn't anybody to turn to back then.  The comments made us uncomfortable but girls back then didn't speak up.  The reasons do not matter-we just didn't.

 

Now college was different-pouring a beer on the head of a sexist pig was perfectly acceptable but we still didn't report the behavior.

 

We are looking at accusations when harassment laws were non-existent.  Who would ever report a rape, let alone a rape by a co-worker?  Or any type of sexual assault.

 

Some men AND women do not view this type of behavior as any big of a deal. 

And there ARE women who will sexually banter back and forth with male co-workers.

 

So who will step up for the victims when the victims have no recourse?  Even today it can turn into a horror show for the accuser.

 

I feel so badly for any person who had to deal with any of this; and while accusations can be thrown out there without proof, it still merits a serious look at work place sexual harassment as well as sexual harassament in other places such as schools.


@Cakers3  I am old enough to have marched for the ERA.  I have my grandmother's voter registration from the instant women got the vote.  I have had a successful career and now realize that you have to be tough to make it in the world:  if you are of color, a woman, a hillbilly, not attractive, overweight, have a bad accent and a number of other things that elicit prejudice and ill treatment.  I come from a long line of tough and independent women.  I was raised that way.

 

Ill treatment of course is not right, but I understand that a person simply has to do the best they can in life because it isn't fair and it isn't easy.  Things don't change until the culture changes. harassment won't change until enough women won't go along with it.  ALso, you have to figure out what the real definition of sx harassment it and more clearly define that.  It can't be everything. . . 

 

Actually it won't stop because sx has been a bartering tool since the earth was populated and will continue to be. And remember, men can be victims as well.  Therefore, to ensure it isn't a factor depends a lot on the individual and how they handle it and respond to it (of course I am not talking about forced actions here).  Note that Charlie Rose seemed to have stopped with at least some of  those who made it clear that it was a no go--at least in some situations, I haven't read everything about this.

 

The most effective way to deal with it now is to emphasize to young women how to respond to unwanted advances, and not to go along with banter leading up to it or say that is it not wanted early on

 

Not saying what is "right" here, just stating my opinion that was formed through many school and working years and what I have observed.  I can't imagine how you deal with it in today's culture really.  In a world where "whatever" is permitted, how do you even draw a line?  Just look at movies and tv.  You don't see many where someone says no do you?  Can you imagine the social pressure on males and females?  

Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,606
Registered: ‎06-27-2010

Re: Charlie rose?

[ Edited ]

suzyQ3 wrote:

I have a sense of where this is going. The multitude of accusations is going to cause a backlash. People will mock the whole thing.


 

            This is a salient, insightful, and prescient point, @suzyQ3, and it jabbed a tender nerve that I felt in reading quickly through this thread.   There's so much more I could say...  but the nagging thought bubbling up was this:   As long as any of us view this topic as fodder for any humor, mockery, flippant dismissive jests, or with even the smallest hint of minimizing how serious and damaging this is, we feed into what has permitted this disease to fester and to permeate and infect society.   It's certainly not a simple problem, and we need to work together to try and understand it, sort it out, and look for reasonable solutions, but there's nothing funny or laughable about it.    This kind of abuse decimates the spirit, scars the soul, and even with the best therapy in the world we don't come out the other side of the darkness the same as we were before...  and this topic never will put a smile on my face.

 

Few things reveal your intellect and your generosity of spirit—the parallel powers of your heart and mind—better than how you give feedback.~Maria Popova
Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,752
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

I wonder why we see women who can’t believe this kind of sexual harassment happens at all. 

 

Then there are others who insinuate it was the fault of the victim.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,334
Registered: ‎10-16-2010

Was a fan of the Charlie Rose show for years. Years ago--maybe 14, 15 years ago--I read an anonymous message about working for him that had been posted in a now-defunct women's forum. Couldn't bring myself to watch the show again. Ever since Weinstein I'd been wondering when Rose would be the focus of harrassment stories. According to the Washington Post story everyone who worked for him was well-aware of the, um, problem, including his top producer. But felt powerless to do anything.

 

That's the problem. Everyone feels powerless to do anything to stop it. Especially the victims. Which is why they are targeted to be victims.

 

It is truly a tragedy. In so many regards. And for so many lives.

 

I remember one classic Rose show when he was on CBS in which he spent an entire 30 minutes interviewing a woman who had written a history of knitting in America. Who else would dare to do that on a major network?

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,527
Registered: ‎03-10-2010
@Noel7 I don’t think anyone has done that in this thread.
*********************
Keepin' it real.