Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
‎02-08-2020 12:41 PM - edited ‎02-08-2020 02:21 PM
@occasionalrain wrote:@San Antonio Gal I wrote complicit meaning that, while not guilty, they chose to disregard red flags and invested anyway.
Some even invested all their savings. It is common sense 101 never to gamble more than you can afford to lose. It's akin to stranger danger warnings, some accept and some ignore..
This logic is if someone murdered an entire family,
was tried, conviced & sentenced to 150 years,
then released the killer...
all while justifying the killer's actions because
the dead family left their door unlocked.
Madoff need to pay for his crimes.
'Until death do us part.'
‎02-08-2020 02:06 PM
This post has been removed by QVC because it is political
‎02-08-2020 02:11 PM
@sidsmom wrote:
@occasionalrain wrote:@San Antonio Gal I wrote complicit meaning that, while not guilty, they chose to disregard red flags and invested anyway.
Some even invested all their savings. It is common sense 101 never to gamble more than you can afford to lose. It's akin to stranger danger warnings, some accept and some ignore..
This logic is if someone murdeed an entire family,
was tried, conviced & sentenced to 150 years,
then released the killer...
all while justifying the killer's actions because
the dead family left their door unlocked.
Madoff need to pay for his crimes.
'Until death do us part.'
Your analogy is more like having one's bank account hacked because of a weak password. Mine was more like a member of the family inviting a questionable person, who turns out to be a killer, into their home.
Madoff didn't hack their account and steal their money, they handed it over to him, an invitation.
‎02-08-2020 02:25 PM
@occasionalrain wrote:
@sidsmom wrote:
@occasionalrain wrote:@San Antonio Gal I wrote complicit meaning that, while not guilty, they chose to disregard red flags and invested anyway.
Some even invested all their savings. It is common sense 101 never to gamble more than you can afford to lose. It's akin to stranger danger warnings, some accept and some ignore..
This logic is if someone murdeed an entire family,
was tried, conviced & sentenced to 150 years,
then released the killer...
all while justifying the killer's actions because
the dead family left their door unlocked.
Madoff need to pay for his crimes.
'Until death do us part.'
Your analogy is more like having one's bank account hacked because of a weak password. Mine was more like a member of the family inviting a questionable person, who turns out to be a killer, into their home.
Madoff didn't hack their account and steal their money, they handed it over to him, an invitation.
Can't believe people support Bernie Madoff's crime.
People above the law kinda/sorta think this way.
Just a head's up.
No one gets away with crime.
‎02-08-2020 02:40 PM
@occasionalrain wrote:@San Antonio Gal I wrote complicit meaning that, while not guilty, they chose to disregard red flags and invested anyway.
Some even invested all their savings. It is common sense 101 never to gamble more than you can afford to lose. It's akin to stranger danger warnings, some accept and some ignore..
@occasionalrain - so all those charities and organizaitons that invested with him should have known better?
‎02-08-2020 03:03 PM - edited ‎02-08-2020 03:12 PM
@San Antonio Gal wrote:@occasionalrain - so all those charities and organizaitons that invested with him should have known better?
She did say they were complicit, which means they chose to be involved in an illegal or questionable act.
‎02-08-2020 03:11 PM
All predatory minded thieves share a common belief, that foolish people deserve to be stolen from.
‎02-08-2020 03:19 PM
To say he didn't kill anyone might be quite speculative. Who knows how many more bone marrow transplants could have been given with the 1.8 million dollars that was lost ,due to Madoff's thievery?
‎02-08-2020 03:25 PM
@San Antonio Gal Yes, they should have questioned the promised return on their investment and opted for a more reasonable, conservative rate of return. They should have considered that to get that return something illegal, perhaps immoral, was likely involved.
They shouldn't have risk money that wasn't theirs and, if lost, others would suffer that loss, not them.
I have never excused Madoff, he deserved a jail term. I only recommenced releasing him now that he's dying because it's the right thing to do and save tax payers the exorbitant cost of keeping him in prison.
‎02-08-2020 04:04 PM
@Free2be wrote:All predatory minded thieves share a common belief, that foolish people deserve to be stolen from.
Repost for emphasis 👆👆👆👆👆
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2025 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved.  | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788