Stay in Touch
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
Sign in
06-14-2021 07:51 PM
I just read this , it owns Tatcha and Kate Sommerville and many others , Paula had already been bought out several years ago. Prices really went up , i doubt there will be many changes,
06-14-2021 08:05 PM
That's a shame, Unilever is NOT cruelty free.
Unilever is not cruelty-free
Unilever is not cruelty-free. They may test on animals, either themselves, through their suppliers, or through a third party. Brands who fall under this category could also be selling products where animal testing is required by law.
Is Unilever Cruelty-Free? | 2021 Cruelty-Free Kitty Update (crueltyfreekitty.com)
06-14-2021 08:05 PM
Thanks for the heads up . I have been using Paula's Choice for over a year now. I just placed an order today . I know Unilever is NOT A Cruelty Free comapny . If Paua's Choice is no longer cruelty free , I will sadly be looking for replacements . WIll have to find out more information . Thanks again
06-14-2021 08:20 PM
Hi I just went emailed Paulas CHoice and told them to cancel the order I just did this afternoon and that I was extremely disappointed at the news .
06-14-2021 08:28 PM
So that means Tatcha is not cruelty free ?
06-14-2021 08:36 PM
Isn't this the same company that bought The Ordinary too? I eat meat and I know there are tons more companies that test on animals and have animal by-products in them. It would be a full time job to weed products out of your life that didn't test on or contain animal parts of some sort. Having said that, I totally respect others to do what they feel in their hearts is right for them. This topic has been a controversial one for decades. If animals aren't used for testing products, does that mean humans would be?
06-14-2021 08:38 PM
Many websites state that Tatcha is cruelty free.
06-14-2021 08:55 PM
@monicakm wrote:Isn't this the same company that bought The Ordinary too? I eat meat and I know there are tons more companies that test on animals and have animal by-products in them. It would be a full time job to weed products out of your life that didn't test on or contain animal parts of some sort. Having said that, I totally respect others to do what they feel in their hearts is right for them. This topic has been a controversial one for decades. If animals aren't used for testing products, does that mean humans would be?
Estee Lauder owns The Ordinary.
06-14-2021 09:04 PM
@monicakm wrote:Isn't this the same company that bought The Ordinary too? I eat meat and I know there are tons more companies that test on animals and have animal by-products in them. It would be a full time job to weed products out of your life that didn't test on or contain animal parts of some sort. Having said that, I totally respect others to do what they feel in their hearts is right for them. This topic has been a controversial one for decades. If animals aren't used for testing products, does that mean humans would be?
@monicakm I would think it would mean that they could find alternative ways of testing.......the way cruelty free companies do. It can be done and more people should stand up to demanding this. The horrendous things these poor creatures are put through isn't worth any beauty product IMO.
06-14-2021 09:45 PM
I gave up on Paula after things changed with the first sale. This is sad to see.
Get sneak previews of special offers & upcoming events delivered to your inbox.
*You're signing up to receive QVC promotional email.
Find recent orders, do a return or exchange, create a Wish List & more.
Privacy StatementGeneral Terms of Use
QVC is not responsible for the availability, content, security, policies, or practices of the above referenced third-party linked sites nor liable for statements, claims, opinions, or representations contained therein. QVC's Privacy Statement does not apply to these third-party web sites.
© 1995-2024 QVC, Inc. All rights reserved. | QVC, Q and the Q logo are registered service marks of ER Marks, Inc. 888-345-5788