Beauty

[daisyk]

I found a blurb on Bloomberg business page that states her age as 62 which seems right. I don't think she's 71. She supposedly founded her business when she was 25.

[Katcat1]

On 6/20/2014 sahmIam said:

She looks AMAZING for 71. If she's has any work done, it has been done VERY well; exactly the kind you WANT to have done.

Price-wise, I think they're right where they should be considering what her competitors charge. Her line is classic, doesn't have an overabundance of products (unlike most lines) so you buy only what you need and will use.

The blouses are something she started with years ago; something about showing of the neckline/shoulders and how flattering it is for most woman. I read something about it somewhere, lol.

Thank you, sahmIam, for clearing the blouse thing up. I'm glad she's not into colors or pattern blouses! Ha! Personally, I believe she definitely has had work done. Even the best of us with beautiful complexions have flaws at 71 and Trish looks too perfect. She needs to look good as she is selling beauty products and most of the ladies doing it go under the knife.

[4doggies]

I don't think she's in her 70's, several google articles said she started her company in 1978 at the age of 25--which would make her in her early 60's. She still looks wonderful for early 60's, I'm her age and I wish I looked that good.