@Mindy D
I am quite aware of the statistics of Cologard, and the false/positives and false/negatives. To me it is a worthless test when there is a Gold Standard available. I want accurate results, not results given in percentage accuracy numbers.
Low Risk does not equate to No Risk. All 3 of my older sisters were Low Risk for Breast Cancer. Of those, 2 had Breast Cancer, and my youngest died of Cancer related to it's origin as Breast Cancer.
You get what you pay for, and me? I prefer paying more, both in $$$ and in my time, to get the Gold Standard Tests needed to keep my continuing my very active lifestyle into even an older age.
As I said above: "Low Risk/No Risk", are pretty distinct in their meanings. Word like Marginal/Nominal/Average mean nothing. I worked with 20 men on 1 job. The "Average Weight" was 190lbs, Average. If not for my 135lb weight, the Average would have been higher. Thus, "Average" says nothing, in my world.
Colon Cancer is one of the most preventable of Cancers, after Cervical Cancer, which makes it #2. Woman get regular screenings for other types of cancer on a regular basis. Do they settle for bypassing the best method of detection, or just a typical annual physical.
If my Gastroenterologist suggested Cologard to me, I would find another doctor. High Risk/Low Risk, would not enter my mind.
I stated many times on this forum my feelings on Colon and Prostate Cancers, both among the most preventable. Until better testing comes along, for Colon Cancer, my choice would be to have my 16th Colonoscopy.
hckynut
hckynut(john)