Reply
Regular Contributor
Posts: 156
Registered: ‎10-03-2013

Has anyone been diagnosed with Breast Calcifications?  I have been going for a mammogram every 6 months for the last 2 years. July was my last 6 month appointment and I was told the calcifications are increasing so they want me to have a biopsy which is scheduled for tomorrow.

Has anyone had this issue?

 

Thank you for any info you can provide. 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,129
Registered: ‎07-21-2020

What we expect to hear from mainstream medicine: “Despite the minimal risks and ongoing studies about cancer seeding during biopsy, collecting tissue samples has been one of the most useful tools in battling cancer. These samples give medical teams a lot of information that helps tailor treatments to give patients the best chance of recovery. “You glean from a biopsy the type of tumor it is, whether it is malignant or benign, and how aggressive it is,” said Dr. Jonathan Epstein, Professor of Pathology, Urology and Oncology and Director of Surgical Pathology at Johns Hopkins Hospital. “You can also do special studies sometimes for certain markers, which can help determine therapy and which types of tumors would respond to different types of therapy.”

 

Given how many people die from cancer each year it seems that oncologists are exaggerating both the usefulness and safety of biopsies and just about everything else they do. Dr. Vincent Gammill, Center for the Study of Natural Oncology in Solana Beach, California, presented a case of a woman who had successfully treated her breast cancer naturally since 1994. Last year, her conventional oncologist convinced her that she was a fool to refuse a needle biopsy. She now has new tumors at each of the puncture sites. “I rarely see distant metastasis until after a biopsy – and then it grows rapidly everywhere, especially in the bones,” Gammill said.

In 2011, researchers for Mayo Clinic College of Medicine reported that transperitoneal biopsy of cancer of the bile duct is associated with a higher rate of peritoneal metastasis and they recommend the procedure not be performed if a curative method exists.

 

Most hospitals and oncologists require biopsies. One small private clinic in Baja, Mexico, like most alternative centers that treat cancer do not. “Many patients come to us because they don’t want to have a biopsy. Especially breast and prostate patients. We respect their wishes, and offer tumor marker testing, color Doppler sonograms, ultrasounds and whole body thermography instead,” says Dr. Antonio Jimenez of Hope4Cancer Institute.

Dr. Thomas Seyfried warns against doing biopsies because of its dangers. The problem is that when you stab into the cancer microenvironment to remove a part of the tissue, it creates a wound in that microenvironment that in turn elicits the invasion by macrophages and other immune cells.

If you already have an acidic microenvironment, you run the risk of causing a fusion hybridization event in that microenvironment between your macrophages and cancer stem cells. This could turn a potentially benign situation into a malignant one, and if the tumor is malignant, stabbing into it could make a bad situation worse.

The question is, what is the value of doing a biopsy in the first place? We take biopsies of breast tissue to get a genomic readout of the different kinds of mutations that might be in the cells. Now, if cancer is not a genetic disease and the mutations are largely irrelevant, then it makes no sense to do that in the first place. If the tumor is benign, why would you want to stab it? If the tumor is malignant, why would you ever want to stab it? I came to this view by reading so many articles in the literature based on brain cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, liver cancer showing how needle biopsies have led to the dissemination of these tumor cells, putting these people at risk for metastatic cancer and death, Seyfried says.

“In metabolic therapy, you would not touch the tumor; you would not disturb the microenvironment. By leaving it alone, you allow the tumor to shrink and go away. When you start to look at this as a biological problem, many of the things that we do in cancer make no sense. We have, in brain cancer, people say, ‘You have a very low-grade tumor. Let’s go in and get it out.’ What happens is you go in and get it out, and then the following year it turns into a glioblastoma.How did that happen? Well, you disturbed the microenvironment. You allowed these cells that are marginally aggressive to become highly aggressive. Then you lead to the demise of the patient, Seyfried says.

"Have a heart that never hardens, and a temper that never tires, and a touch that never hurts." Charles Dickens
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,663
Registered: ‎08-19-2011

Breast calcifications are pretty common.  I have had them since my 20's.  Did you also have an ultrasound?  My understanding is that ultrasounds are more useful than mammo's for these.  I get ultrasounds once a year with my mammo.  There have been periods of time when I also was checked every 6 months, and have had a few biopsies, both needle and surgical.

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 12
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Hi, I had a biopsy two years ago. They took 11 samples and they were all calcifications. It wasn't painful but was scary. So Sorry you have to go through it.

 

Hannah

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,274
Registered: ‎06-11-2024

0Re: Breast Calcifications

[ Edited ]

 

Breast calcifications are pretty common on mammography and can be the results of all kinds of processes from infections, trauma, benign masses, pre-malignant disorders, maligancies and even calcified blood vessels. 

 

The radiologist would be classifying them by mammographic criteria from BIRADS 1 to BIRADS 5.   Those that fall into BIRADS 4 and 5 should be biopsied.   Most likely you have some BIRADS 4 calcifictions that need examination by biopsy and microscopic exmaination by a pathologist.   The malignancy rate for BIRADS 4 is generally less than 30%, so this classification is meant to be very conservative and give reassurance to benign processes. 

 

I've had this stereotactic core biopsy procedure and it is only a bit awkward, and not painful.  The radiologist does a mammogram with you in a position where it is easiest to get to the abnormal area.  This could be you lying on a table with the breast hanging down a bit through a section of the table, or sitting up.  Then there is a small injection of anesthetic in the skin.  Then the radiologist makes a tiny nick in the skin and introduces the biopsy needle into the abnormal area based on the measurements from the mammogram taken just before.  The biopsy needle also introduces a tiny marker into the area so this area can be identified mammographically after the procedure.   The marker is about the size of a large poppyseed and is made of titanium with a distinctive appearance on mmammogram. I felt a little "pinprick" or even a little bit of a tug, but no pain.   You get a bandaid and go home.   The process takes less than an hour and the radiologist and assistant are very experienced and do a lot to make you comfortable.   

 

The report goes to the radiologist and they should call you in about a week.

 

I feel mammographic screening has improved a great deal since the old days, and I know the breast imaging and core biopsy process is far better than it was a decade ago, with dedicated breast imaging centers and specialized qualifications and certifications for breast radiologists.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,857
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Breast Calcifications

[ Edited ]

@Squirt60  I would get biopsy. In 2001 I had a calcification .. left it.    In 2002 after mammo, the calcification was erose. Meaning the edges were irregular.  Had biopsy, it was Ductal carcinoma institute.  ((DCIS).  It took 3 surgeries to get clean edges, then radiation.  Some calcification are round and they can tell it's normal.  The longer one keeps the calcifications the wider the chances of it turning to cancer.  IMO, I would get biopsy.  Better than continually subjecting yourself to radiation from repeated mammos,and the worry.  I have 3 friends who wound up with breast cancer same time I did. What are the odds of that?  We all had different kinds, and different treatments. But,we all had one thing in common.  We waited too long....because they said it was ok to wait.  Who knows?   it's a crop shoot. I didn't do chemo, just radiation , thank God.  But both my friends had chemo. One kept going back to doc with this lump.  Surgeon couldnt find it on mammo. My friend was 40, had extremely dense breasts. Long story short, she researched, went by her gut ...changed dr, got a good surgeon to look at another mammo.   It was a huge cancerous tumor that hadn't been detected, but could be felt at certain angles. It was a difficult find.  A good surgeon ( one who has many breast surgeries under his belt) can decide. She had surgery... and long time chemo, and radiation.  Thank God, she is here today celebrating retirement and her 64 birthday,   I have one bit of advice.  If you are uneasy, unsure, go to another good, well known surgeon to look at mammos. Good luck. 

“sometimes you have to bite your upper lip and put sunglasses on”….Bob Dylan
Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,778
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

My friend was told long time ago that ones that are scattered throughout the breast are of less concern then if they appeear in one area in a cluster. Hers are scattered and have never been biopsed. Best of luck. 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 985
Registered: ‎01-03-2011

@shoekitty   I could not agree more.  Like you -- I had calcifications on my mammogram -- had an ultrasound -- biopsy -- and turned out to be DCIS.  Lumpectomy -- radiation (which I found very easy) -- Tamoxifen for 5 years -- done.  This happened in 2011.  I cannot imagine not having a biopsy -- especially given that DCIS can become invasive.  My gynecologist called me "the poster child for mammograms."  Found and treated very early.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,778
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Breast Calcifications

[ Edited ]

For the last 3 years i have been paying $40 out of pocket for an AI reading of mamm, still get the normal reading from a rad, but this is an extra set of eyes so to speak. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,778
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@judy0330 wrote:

@shoekitty   I could not agree more.  Like you -- I had calcifications on my mammogram -- had an ultrasound -- biopsy -- and turned out to be DCIS.  Lumpectomy -- radiation (which I found very easy) -- Tamoxifen for 5 years -- done.  This happened in 2011.  I cannot imagine not having a biopsy -- especially given that DCIS can become invasive.  My gynecologist called me "the poster child for mammograms."  Found and treated very early.


I have a friend who just went thru very similar sitution, she also found it to be very easy , only had to go for rad 5 times. Also taking a med for 5 years.