Suggestion Box

[IamMrsG]

I don't understand why it is difficult to just ignore the offensive ones and move around them.  

Be honest, don't you do it daily in real-time?  

[Zita]

To Keyai @QVC  -- you (and other administrators) could benefit from a grammar review:

Sentence reads better like this: "This feature allowed you to select forum posters whose posts you did not wish to see."   Your way is awkward.

[HappyDaze]

---

@IamMrsG wrote:

I don't understand why it is difficult to just ignore the offensive ones and move around them.  

Be honest, don't you do it daily in real-time?  

---

I'm not sure why it bothers you or anyone else if people want this feature? Some people do. Big deal. I don't need one but I don't  begrudge others that want it since it doesn't affect me one way or another.

[IamMrsG]

---

@HappyDaze wrote:

---

@IamMrsG wrote:

I don't understand why it is difficult to just ignore the offensive ones and move around them.  

Be honest, don't you do it daily in real-time?  

---

I'm not sure why it bothers you or anyone else if people want this feature? Some people do. Big deal. I don't need one but I don't begrudge others that want it since it doesn't affect me one way or another.

---

Have you ever heard what assuming does to someone?  You've jumped to some very erroneous assumptions.  Better luck next time. 

[HappyDaze]

---

@IamMrsG wrote:

---

@HappyDaze wrote:

---

@IamMrsG wrote:

I don't understand why it is difficult to just ignore the offensive ones and move around them.  

Be honest, don't you do it daily in real-time?  

---

I'm not sure why it bothers you or anyone else if people want this feature? Some people do. Big deal. I don't need one but I don't begrudge others that want it since it doesn't affect me one way or another.

---

Have you ever heard what assuming does to someone?  You've jumped to some very erroneous assumptions.  Better luck next time. 

---

Oh then please correct me and explain why you posted what you did? i am curious.

[Keyai]

---

@Zita wrote:

@To Keyai @QVC  -- you (and other administrators) could benefit from a grammar review:

Sentence reads better like this: "This feature allowed you to select forum posters whose posts you did not wish to see."   Your way is awkward.

---

Thanks for the correction. I edited to the post to reflect your wording which is definitely not as awkwardly written as I had initially posted.

[icezeus]

Wow!!

[Adelina]

---

@Zita wrote:

@To Keyai @QVC  -- you (and other administrators) could benefit from a grammar review:

Sentence reads better like this: "This feature allowed you to select forum posters whose posts you did not wish to see."   Your way is awkward.

---

_______________________________

Seriously?! 

You have the patience of a saint @Keyai!

[stevieb]

---

@Krimpette wrote:

In some ways, this new format seems rather unsophisticated (obsolete?).  I wonder if QVC knew what they were getting into.  The previous format was infinitely better.  But that's OK, I am more productive with my time these days!  (Thanks for the update about "ignore".  I agree - "bummer").

---

It's very clunky.  For example, quoting and editing require more steps than is necessary.  Despite the addition of some nice features (of which the emoticons are defintely not one...) I have to agree the boards seem more labor intensive than they need to be.

[stevieb]

---

@IamMrsG wrote:

I don't understand why it is difficult to just ignore the offensive ones and move around them.  

Be honest, don't you do it daily in real-time?  

---

I agree with you. I never used this feature in the old forums and, overall, preferred to just skip over posts and posters of my choosing.  Still, for those who value and miss it, I can't see that it would hurt anything to have it...  It's another option and I'm all for options!