Suggestion Box

[NativeJax]

Thanks for removing some of the posts that were directed at the hosts which might offend the hosts. I was especially happy to see the on about Carolyn removed!

[Venezia]

I'll second that! 

[proudlyfromNJ]

I'll third that!!!

[NativeJax]

Hey ladies, maybe we should team up and start a thread where people can only post something pleasant or positive about hosts and vendors....might be empowering....name the thread "I Spy Something Nice!".....in fact I am doing that next!

[NativeJax]

I put it in Q Talk....let's make it a great way to build people up instead of tearing them down!

[NativeJax]

So I guess then your not part of the solution your part of the problem Zita.....better luck next time and God Bless you and I mean that with all my heart.....who couldn't use a few random acts of kindness or blessings?

[NativeJax]

Keep trying Zita, you might find it rewarding to play nice in the sandbox.....for some people it's much easier to tear people down than to build them up. I will continue to try and be positive, no matter who it irritates.

[cotto22]

  Does everyone have to hero worship hosts and vendors on QVC? Surely they are all

not perfect! I know we can all improve in our performance on the job, and constructive criticism is one way we do that.

  I, for one, shop on QVC for its products, not to be friends with its hosts. I am not invested in their personal lives and don't get upset if they do mention their kids or do not mention their vacation plans. If they gain weight or lose weight, that is none of my business. But when they don't give me pertinent information about the item they are trying to sell me, are repetitive to the point of distraction, then it becomes my business as a potential customer. I think I have the right to comment when a host is off task and doesn't give sizing or colors or spends so much time off task that they don't do the job that they were hired to do. I don't think that is being mean. In all reality, I rarely do that, as it is hardly ever worth the time to post, and with the new moderators breathing down our backs, it might get deleted anyway. 

  It would be best to remember that purpose of QVC and their hosts: to sell products to the public and to make a buck. They are not a charitable institution!

[PeterDM]

I do feel that there is a lot of unnecessary criticism.  However, i have also seen threads that have started off with legitimate criticism and soon been hijacked by those who would want to either shut it down or bash the hosts for fun.  In these cases, I've been disappointed that the moderators, instead of removing the individual, controversial posts, have shut down the entire thread.  I think that's a very lazy tactic on behalf of the moderators, and they would do better to set an example of these trouble-makers by allowing the people who are being constructive to move forward with the conversation.  I know I'll get poofed if I mention specific examples, so I'll just say that I've seen this happen within the last 12 hours.  If the moderators cannot properly manage the Q Talk and Suggestion Box Forums, and everything that is perceived as negative by them alone is inappropriate for posting, then it seems silly to even have those forums.  It is becoming very difficult to tell what may be perceived as a counter-point versus a bashing during the course of these conversations.  Lines are blurred, so that's why I think moderator's need to practice being more skillful surgeons rather than assembly line butchers.