Suggestion Box

[Bird mama]

---

@biancardi wrote:

birdmama, they did post a reason why the thread was removed - if you have your thread view set to 50 threads per page, it is on the second page.

---

Thanks for bringing the location of the moved thread to my attention Biancardi.  As soon as it happened, I thought I would see why.  I wanted to determine if it was something I said.  I never expected the moderator to immediately bury it on page two.

I will agree that there were a few tense posts for a minute or two, but overall was not the ugliest thread I've ever read.

QVC Moderators - never mind :-)

[physicsnut]

When they have their agenda it stays, When they disagree with you - it goes - it is that simple. 

[gardensla]

---

@missy1 wrote:

The Q must of hired all these "new" moderators. IMO it will taper off in a bit. (they want us to get used to the STRICT posting rules) Not a whole lot can be talked about on community chats.  

---

Funny how they're not so willing to wish to the cornfield posts that are seemingly in their defense. This obnoxious post (copied below in italics) was plunked right into the middle of a discussion about why a post in the TV forum was pulled (reason was "profanity" but no one knows what the "profane" word was).

To me this kind of post is the essense of what baiting, jabbing, bullying and every other verb the Q's moderators are using to describe posts that are intended to incite an arugmentative reaction from others. If I'd had my "ignore user" button I would have employed it.

Go ahead and moderate to your heart's content, but be fair and pull posts that are looking for trouble, even as they cast you in a "positive" light:

@KYToby wrote:

This is a private board owned and operated by QVC.  Please stop pretending that your rights have somehow been violated and Western Civilisation will end because QVC's moderarors are neither inclined nor compelled to justify their actions to yiu.