Reply
Valued Contributor
Posts: 735
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Why are the sizes going back to 2,4,6? What happened to the small medium large, etc.

I'm more comfortable with the s, m l 1x etc.{#emotions_dlg.sad}

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,746
Registered: ‎01-19-2015
I agree. I think one of the show hosts said recently that they're looking for a more customized fit. It also means more people will have to return things because it's easier to choose a medium, let's say, than zero in on a specific numeric size.
~~Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the 'm' is silent.~~
Honored Contributor
Posts: 12,702
Registered: ‎08-22-2013

I think you will find you will get a better fit with the numerical size because say a size med is a 10/12 and if your a true size 10 the fit will be off. My suggestion is if you are a med and it fits you really well go with a size 10.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,213
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

QVC will make more money if items need to be returned.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,746
Registered: ‎01-19-2015
On 3/5/2015 insomniac said:

QVC will make more money if items need to be returned.

Exactly!
~~Be careful when you follow the masses. Sometimes the 'm' is silent.~~
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,102
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

as I posted on another thread about numerical sizing.....I won't purchase...I have no idea how to choose a size that way....and I refuse to order a product with only a guess...and then be stuck with the outrageous cost of returns....I just stung by that....to the tune of $12.95 in return shipping....

Highlighted
Honored Contributor
Posts: 17,892
Registered: ‎07-03-2013
I've noticed a few items with numerical sizes. Has there been mention that all q clothing is heading in that direction? I prefer the s, m, l, etc. I won't order if it's a numerical size. I'm not going to experiment to find the right size.