Reply
Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,106
Registered: ‎12-13-2010

Its really cute, but it will be blazing hot here with high humidity by end of May....but, I have my eye on the pink! 

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,042
Registered: ‎11-20-2010

I bought the leggings shown last night in the Wild Berry and Azure Blue. LOGO is my go to for leggings.

 

I really like her colors and prints but don't buy LOGO tops because they are too long for me.  The only LOGO tops I did buy were the mesh shirts in a coral print and a green print.  I bought them last year.  

Super Contributor
Posts: 286
Registered: ‎10-24-2010

I just purchased the pink jacket.  I am hoping again that the "denim" material isn't too thin.  I had a garage sale a few months ago.  What I didn't sell was given to the thrift/goodwill stores.  I even had clothes hanging on the walls because my closet was too full!  I realized again that many of the LOGO clothes I had never had been worn.    Many of the clothes I see on QVC seem to be cheaply made and way too expensive but still cute.  This is my opinion.  At least I am not bashing any hostess as so many do on this forum. 

 

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,483
Registered: ‎02-27-2012

@layla2450 wrote:

@bestday wrote:

LOGO Denim Jacket is nice - not for me, but nice. It's a surprise she didn't put a ruffle, embroidered flowers, tie dye the sleeves, or put patches here & there.  I prefer a shorter jacket & a more traditional jean jacket, but it's nice.

 

The gauze shirt is also nice, but really Lori, $71.58 - normally $78.73. Most of the other fashions are as to be expected - over the top gaudy. 

 

This is, of course, my opinion only. 

 

 


Denim jackets with frayed hems can be found at several stores for LESS. I agree that MOST of her tops are GAUDY, and her prints are HIDEOUS. The material she uses is CHEAP and THIN.  ALL of the clothing she sells is WAY OVERPRICED. I watch LG when I need a good laugh!!!


 

Oh geez, here we go again.....nasty comments in all caps and bold....what a shock.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,483
Registered: ‎02-27-2012

@SharkE wrote:

Glad I ordered mine in the light purple last night my size is on waitlist.


Such a pretty color @SharkE  !

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,781
Registered: ‎06-19-2010

@layla2450 wrote:

@bestday wrote:

LOGO Denim Jacket is nice - not for me, but nice. It's a surprise she didn't put a ruffle, embroidered flowers, tie dye the sleeves, or put patches here & there.  I prefer a shorter jacket & a more traditional jean jacket, but it's nice.

 

The gauze shirt is also nice, but really Lori, $71.58 - normally $78.73. Most of the other fashions are as to be expected - over the top gaudy. 

 

This is, of course, my opinion only. 

 

 


Denim jackets with frayed hems can be found at several stores for LESS. I agree that MOST of her tops are GAUDY, and her prints are HIDEOUS. The material she uses is CHEAP and THIN.  ALL of the clothing she sells is WAY OVERPRICED. I watch LG when I need a good laugh!!

 

I agree. I just bought a light green denim jacket at Kohls yesterday for around $33.00 the only thing bad is I'll probably have to wait till next year to wear it because it's not that cold. 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 6,106
Registered: ‎12-13-2010

@Reilley wrote:

I just purchased the pink jacket.  I am hoping again that the "denim" material isn't too thin.  I had a garage sale a few months ago.  What I didn't sell was given to the thrift/goodwill stores.  I even had clothes hanging on the walls because my closet was too full!  I realized again that many of the LOGO clothes I had never had been worn.    Many of the clothes I see on QVC seem to be cheaply made and way too expensive but still cute.  This is my opinion.  At least I am not bashing any hostess as so many do on this forum. 

 

 

 


@Reilly, I have my eye on that pink color but I'm actually hoping its not a heavy jean jacket weight 😄 - just too hot here in VA in the summer. I know what you mean by thin/cheap...dont want that either. The presentation I saw it looked nicely made.