Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 15,736
Registered: ‎10-09-2012

@elated wrote:

@Caaareful Shopper wrote:

@elated wrote:

@Caaareful Shopper wrote:

@elated  Yes, that item # I included is for Kim's jogger, I mentioned that.  Towards the end of that jogger presentation, Kim brought out two of her new bags and showed them to Mary.  That's what the video shows.   


@Caaareful Shopper Actually, you didn't mention it was a jogger video that showed her handbags. You might want to re-read your posts.

 

"here are a couple of screen shots.  But you can get a better look at the video for item # A714160.  She shows two handbags to Mary towards the very end of the video."

 


@elated   If you looked at the video you would have seen the handbags.  That was the very reason I wanted to help posters out by saying it's "towards the very end of the video."  Did you even watch it as suggested? I don't know how that could have been clearer.

 

If I ever try to help out again by sharing information that someone requested, you can just bypass my post in case I don't write it exactly as you would like.  


@Caaareful Shopper  What I don't like is when someone makes rude and unnecessary comments because they can't accept responsibility.  Don't tell me what I can and can't do.


@elated  Your comments really boggle the mind.  Is there an alternate universe with this forum?

 

You began this back & forth with me with your bold print post that the item # I posted for the video is for the joggers.

 

Yes, it is, and as I suggested, go to the end of that video to see the new handbags Kim showed.  Where did I ever tell you what you can and can't do???  If you don't want to watch it and go to the end of the video, fine.  Then why point out a supposed error (in your mind) when it's you that didn't want to simply watch the video.  Your entire back & forth is meaningless.  

 

I was not rude, I was trying to clarify how you can see the new handbags from the jogger video.

 

But you told me that I "might want to re-read my posts."  Who's being rude here?  

 

This entire exchange is now ridiculous & childish.  Done. 

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,354
Registered: ‎10-23-2015

@stevieb wrote:

I do so wish dear Hushpuppy would take a few months off... Y'all...


@stevieb  Hushpuppy 😂😂😂

Regular Contributor
Posts: 198
Registered: ‎05-05-2025

Back when Kim had Bell's Paulsy, I thought she handled everything in a very classy and  graceful way.  

 

IMO, now she's turned into someone that's selling a ton more merchandise, is a ton richer, but also far less appealing.  And I must be in the minority, because women seem to eat the singing/dancing obnoxiousness up.

Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,781
Registered: ‎07-24-2025

The Belle TSV for tomorrow 12/8 is posted. It's not a handbag, it's jeans. And the price is not an attractive TSV price. It seems Q is pricing Belle items higher than other house brands.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,046
Registered: ‎02-06-2022


@They CallMe Mr Wilkes ☃️



So when are they going to cut Susan Graver then ?? 🥴



I don’t think The Q will cut ties with Kim. If anything Kim will be in charge cutting ties with them instead.



BTW I don’t buy either brands clothing. But I have bought from Kim’s Unique Home Goods line.