Q Talk

[Pearlee]

---

@Shanus wrote:

---

@ALRATIBA wrote:

---

@yolimaria wrote:

I agree with you. Too much LOGO!!!! Do ladies really want to wear all those layers of tops whether they "go together "or not! I have never seen anyladies in the area of Connecticut where I live wearing this type of top,single or pied on.

The other comment is regarding the pants. 99% of the pants shown on ANY clothing show are skin tight. There are MANY of us that would never wear such a thing. Obviously the latter has to happen so the many layers of tops can be worn. Not my style and would bet a piece of chocolate that this is true for many, many ladies.

Time to change styles!!!!

---

@yolimaria

Just curious ... how many people do you see on a daily basis?  

Living in Manhattan, I probably see several hundred just walkiing to the corner.  I see thousands if I walk over to Park Ave or Madison Ave.  Up around Herald Square ... several thousand other people.

Tight pants and LOGO style tops are quite popular with all sizes and all ages.   

---

Seeing thousands of people walking around in a certain style of clothing is different than whether they look well in it.

---

I think most of them are pretty healthy.  And they also look good.

[151949]

I'm not a LOGO fan but it must be making money for QVC or it would not get this much air time.

[teddynm]

"How may people do you see on a daily basis?"...."Living in Manhattan...see thousands in Park Ave or Madison Ave....Herald Square several thousand other people"....How nice.

Thou Manhattan, Park Ave, Madison Ave or Herald Sq may be nice locations which you've seen these "thousands" wearing LOGO fashion....these locations are still only specs on the list of all the other places these fashions potentially may or may not be worn.  As others have mentioned, currently QVC is making money on LOGO and as long as profit is there, they will continue to present.  Until the profit changes & something else becomes the 'fashion of the moment'.....we get to change the channel and not buy.  Just my opinion thou I don't live in spot wear "several thousands" are wearing LOGO....maybe just a handful.

[kelsey17]

I feel the same way about the time spent on Beauty items and products....CONSTANT........BUT i realize i am sure when different items are on that other customers aren't interested in but that I am........they must be frustrated too...........so i just turn the channel...

[Lila4Now]

I agree with OT, tired of Lori's one pony trick tops.  They are all the same top just different colors, fabrics, prints.  I'm also one that doesn't layer.  It's 93 here, with a heat index of 105.  There is no way I want to wear multiple layers of clothes!  At some point, I have to get in a hot car, or walk into a building.  I'm also a busty petite, and those tops just make me look heavy.  Plus, her tops are made of cheap fabric, and hover around $60.  Walmart uses the same fabrics, so no matter what she says, it's just not that special.  She's just like SG in that way.

[jpie]

There is a lot of LOGO.  They keep showing it, and I keep not choosing to buy it!  

[ScarletDove]

Sometimes I think in jest, that QVC should set up a QVC channel devoted solely to Logo!

[Spurt]

---

@Pearlee wrote:

Enough!

Of these threads expressing this same thought and/or dissing LOGO.  There are tons of them already on the board @txskies .  Clearly QVC is making money from LOGO so it will keep showing it, just as it has done with Susan Graver for 25-plus years.

If you don't like the programming either watch something else or turn off the set and go do something constructive like read a book or take a walk.  What's the point of these countless threads over and over and over?   Enough!  If a lot of people didn't like it, QVC wouldn't keep showing it.  D'uh.

---

@Pearlee @2blonde

It would be nice if they put a little variety in their programming and it might also help their revenues. Personally, I think all of QVC's clothing lines seem to look alike these days....

So if all these viewers turned off the TV, read a book and took a walk that means QVC has NO SALES either.......and QVC's revenues keep declining, so encouraging all these potential customers to find something else to do isn't helping QVC and their revenues................

[Spurt]

---

@millieshops wrote:

If we each listed what we personally have no interest in buying and QVC got rid of each, what would be left?

---

@millieshops

Well the plan QVC currently has in place certainly isnt working well for them................And I dont want to hear the same tired line, "well al lot of retailers are doing bad right now"...that may be true but I've been reading about some things they are also doing to improve their game..............

[Spurt]

---

@ALRATIBA wrote:

---

@yolimaria wrote:

I agree with you. Too much LOGO!!!! Do ladies really want to wear all those layers of tops whether they "go together "or not! I have never seen anyladies in the area of Connecticut where I live wearing this type of top,single or pied on.

The other comment is regarding the pants. 99% of the pants shown on ANY clothing show are skin tight. There are MANY of us that would never wear such a thing. Obviously the latter has to happen so the many layers of tops can be worn. Not my style and would bet a piece of chocolate that this is true for many, many ladies.

Time to change styles!!!!

---

@yolimaria

Just curious ... how many people do you see on a daily basis?  

Living in Manhattan, I probably see several hundred just walkiing to the corner.  I see thousands if I walk over to Park Ave or Madison Ave.  Up around Herald Square ... several thousand other people.

Tight pants and LOGO style tops are quite popular with all sizes and all ages.   

@ALRATIBA

 😲😲😮  THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS---AMAZING!

---