Q Talk

[Gabidog]

I had the denim & co show on mute this morning and one twill pant item had regular length $.03 more than petite!  Really?  Does this mean we will soon see price differences between xs  and 1x?  Maybe I missed it over the years of being a customer but $.03 seems like a silly price difference.  Another problem is the graphic department seems a bit lazy these days because a rare few items in this show had fabric content listed or shown.  I guess you have to unmute and listen to Gary or Carolyn....duh, no.

[millieshops]

@Gabidog   Who knows, but a different price wouldn't surprise me.   However, it may be a graphics error.

BTW-  we have no idea why there are errors unless we are privy to massive inside info.   For example, how did you decide lazy instead of overworked?

[Sooner]

Three cents is a problem?  

[Icegoddess]

It's been common practice for years to charge more for Talls.  And even though in theory petites use less fabric, I would actually expect them to charge more rather than less for them because adding petite into the product line requires a change in the setup from the norm.  

[Imaoldhippie]

I think it was a typo.  If I wanted the item 3c would not stop me from ordering.

Maybe you could let the mods know of the possible error.

[GenXmuse]

In this economy, nothing would surprise me. 

[ValuSkr]

That's a good deal.  Go for it!

[Roscoe the Rascal]

If the Q starts doing that it will be more than that.  

[RollTide2008]

It was probably a key stroke error.

[Gabidog]

Today both regular and petite are the same price.  Yesterday the $.03 was a featured price.   I just thought it was an odd price difference.  And maybe graphics is neither lazy or overworked....just do not think fabric content important apparently.  You can give a fabric a name but to me the content is more telling about how a fabric feels.