Re: Whoops!

wilma · ‎03-13-2010

Not the best placement for the daisies. It's rather puzzling that no one at any point in the design, or upon seeing it on fit models, spoke up to address the unfortunate placement. Going up a size wouldn't necessarily mitigate the issue for everyone. It's just not a good design placement IMO.

Be careful with all over placement prints too. I've seen some designs that look like a face, bullseyes on top, and some that point to the crotch. 😱

MoJoV · ‎10-01-2010

@Carolina925 wrote:
It's a bit too ditsy for my liking but, when I first saw Mary this morning, I had to drop my jaw. Is no one behind the camera watching? Very poor placement although the placement on Kim, with her new weight loss, isn't as bad. Maybe Mary should go up a size to allow the daisies to be further down.

And Mary should go up a size in her jeans, they looked bad and uncomfortably tight.

Trees are the lungs of the Earth

EastCoastGal · ‎03-09-2010

@tundracat wrote:
Whoops! Just have to be careful how you wear the daisy sweater from Kim Gravel. If's a cute top but you have to be aware of the placement of the flowers. It didn't work so well on Mary.

@tundracat ... Now Rachel is wearing it on the Gourmet Food Show!!! I just saw one side of her (haha!!) but it looks the same on her! Why is this being sold? It looks ridiculous! I would never show my face in public with this on!

EastCoastGal · ‎03-09-2010

@on the bay wrote:
I noticed the video of that presentation has been taken down and now just that short pre-recorded one they show for a lot of things probably when things go wrong.
That is awful that sweater!

@on the bay ... The video is back up and I just watched it !! How could Mary wear this with a straight face ?!?!

...and Rachel had it on in the green on the Gourmet Food Show before 5 pm. I don't know if the show is still on or not.

Shoppers buying this.... What? and Why?