Really ???

Goodie2shoes · ‎04-30-2012

Sorry but I just had to give my opinion on the Side stitch painted dot Jogger pants A453745 for $115.56. Amy is presenting them on Fashions night in. These pants have paint dots on them that make them appear to me at least like one has been painting and spilled paint all over the pants. It's a California sheek look according to the designer rep. Well to each their own, and enjoy if you buy them but I would not spend $120 (at least w/tax and shipping) on a pair of pants that make me look like I have been painting and went straight out to dinner ! Wow, what's fashion to some is not fashion to others

Luvsmyfam · ‎11-26-2019

i wouldnt pay 100.00 for a pair of pants anytime! i gues the q,thinks their shoppers are wealthy

Mistreatedbycs · ‎03-10-2010

I look at it this way, if you are not an artist and want "something different" at least it's available to buy.

So much looks the same way.

Duckncover · ‎07-16-2021

I already had a pair like that last year that I created while painting one of our bedrooms.....wish I had not been using it for rags since then....I could have made a lot of money!

Janey2 · ‎06-07-2010

@Luvsmyfam I have spent more than $100 on pants, and do not consider myself wealthy. As @Goodie2shoes said, " to each his own".

Duckncover · ‎07-16-2021

I think the Q knows who their demographic is, so apparently they are trying to appeal to a totally different group.

ALRATIBA · ‎07-15-2016

I remember back in the early 90s ....I took a pair of jeans out to the backyard and splattered some fabric paint on them.

They looked great .... but ....

It was a "look" then, and I was a lot younger!

Goodie2shoes · ‎04-30-2012

@Duckncover wrote: I already had a pair like that last year that I created while painting one of our bedrooms.....wish I had not been using it for rags since then....I could have made a lot of money!

So now you know that the next time you paint Save those pants !!