Reply
Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,958
Registered: ‎09-28-2010
On 8/28/2014 millieshops said:

Such a condescending post - not to Leah but to the thousands of QVC customers who ordered those shoes.

Intentional on the part of the OP I'm sure. I've come to the conclusion that many people are playing some kind of game posting on the forums with the condescending and uncalled for statement regarding products. They get their jollies from dissing people and it's a safe place to do it on an anonymous forum.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,860
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Doesn't everyone do housework in Manolos?

~The only difference between this place and the Titanic is that the Titanic had a band.~
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,213
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Generally speaking, hosts have to sell what's decided by PTB.

That being said, the shoes pictured aren't that bad.

Super Contributor
Posts: 431
Registered: ‎07-03-2010
No offense to anyone's opinion on what is fashionable or not BUT I am glad to be even walking in any shoe. Over twenty years ago I broke my ankle severely tearing all the ligaments and tendons in my foot along with a dislocation of my foot. I am thankful to walk but never will be able to wear heels. I had a steel plate and eleven s c r e w s in my foot. Yes QVC has shoes for me that look as good as I will ever be able to wear. Lucky to have feet to even wear shoes. Others do not have the option. Before condemning anyone one's taste remember that QVC sells to lots of different people and not just the fashionistas.
Honored Contributor
Posts: 18,372
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

The last set of shoes (the Softspots) look nice.

☼The best place to seek God is in a garden. You can dig for him there. GBShaw☼
Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,941
Registered: ‎03-30-2010

Geez, I thought there was something wrong with Leah. Glad to know there isn't!

Valued Contributor
Posts: 748
Registered: ‎05-24-2011

It's obvious the OP is trying to push buttons (and succeeding in a few cases). I just put her on Ignore, but I feel before she judges others on what they wear, she should be aware many of us judge her on her grammar (atrocious) and general lack of writing skills.

You simply do not need that comma after "Poor, Leah"

Super Contributor
Posts: 356
Registered: ‎03-15-2010
On 8/28/2014 Zita said:

It's obvious the OP is trying to push buttons (and succeeding in a few cases). I just put her on Ignore, but I feel before she judges others on what they wear, she should be aware many of us judge her on her grammar (atrocious) and general lack of writing skills.

You simply do not need that comma after "Poor, Leah"

I was just about to say the same thing! For someone who thinks she's high and mighty, surely she would know that, ya think?!? "Let's eat Grandma." "Let's eat, Grandma." Punctuation matters.
~~~ So many handbags....so few hands ~~~

Contributor
Posts: 38
Registered: ‎06-05-2012

I did not think the OP was being condescending. But maybe that's because I happen to agree with her statement. I too had hoped that Leah would have trendier shoes. Its not my intention to judge people who like the shoes offered. I certainly don't want to be judged for disliking them. Different stokes for different folks.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 10,698
Registered: ‎03-14-2010
On 8/28/2014 ccassaday said: I also own the Clark's Ashland. They are very cute.

So do I