Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 68,152
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 brii said:
On 10/16/2014 SoX said:

I'm not a follower nor a fan of Lisa, so I may be reading more into the fact that the former CEO's firing may have something to do with her decision. After all, Lisa has been QVC's golden girl during her tenure and that star status may be coming to an end.


I've said the same thing. I think it has more to do with the CEO being fired than anything else.

It might have played a part, but Lisa was the lead host before Watts was hired. To be sure, her role was enhanced to include 'Gili' while Watt was there, but Lisa was pretty much a prime-time fixture long before Watts came on the scene.

Personally, I think Lisa understandably grew weary of the role and with the QVC operation. While I believe that was her primary motivation, I wouldn't discount that the Q is possibly moving to restructure contracts. It doesn't seem as though things are going along all that swimmingly in West Chester these days. There have been more than a handful of vendor defections or contract expirations that weren't renewed and a seeming increasing reliance on both in-house brands and in-house staff, as they continue to narrow their focus down to near oblivion.


In my pantry with my cupcakes...
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,722
Registered: ‎12-06-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 Jojo320 said:

I find it quite unbelievable that someone pulling in her kind of paycheck doesn't have a firm plan in place, other than just saying "there are new adventures waiting for me".

Why? If that's her situation, financially speaking, then it would be the perfect time for her to try something new. What better time is there for someone to jump ship for a new adventure?

Regular Contributor
Posts: 222
Registered: ‎06-09-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

Thanks for clarifying that. It is a courageous step for her. I wish her the very best.
Highlighted
Valued Contributor
Posts: 988
Registered: ‎01-20-2013

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

Ladies, what am I missing? I went to LRs FACEBOOK page, all I see are pictures of her, and comments about future shows. Did not see any comments about her leaving since the original statement. I still think she wanted more money, and QVC refused. Just my opinion, with the track record so far, all who left are doing infomercials . , remember Patti Reilly moving to LA to be a star, she does pillow spots. My question how many pictures a day does she take of herself....someone made a comment about a stepmother when did that happen? Thought her mother recently died.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 25,880
Registered: ‎03-16-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 BOYINTX said:
On 10/16/2014 LipstickDiva said:

I've posted this in another thread about GILI.

QVC just a few days ago applied for the trademark G.I.L.I. with the classification of jewelry only under this trademark.

Their last application was GILI (no periods) and the classification of goods was jewelry, handbags, skirts, blouses, denim, etc. Another company opposed that filing and Q abandoned the application.

Based on that application, it would appear if GILI continues, it will be only jewelry. Perhaps they are going to merge the handbags, clothing and other accessories into another line or change the name.

another company opposed the filing ? Can this mean another Network opposed the filing as if to attempt to take it over and re launch ? The filing thing always confuses me

Another company (any other company, not necessarily another shopping network) may have opposed that QVC trademark filing because it might have been similar to or the same as one of their trademarks. It may not even be in a similar product line, just the trademark symbol.

Valued Contributor
Posts: 3,846
Registered: ‎04-22-2014

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 Miranda1550 said:

Ladies, what am I missing? I went to LRs FACEBOOK page, all I see are pictures of her, and comments about future shows. Did not see any comments about her leaving since the original statement. I still think she wanted more money, and QVC refused. Just my opinion, with the track record so far, all who left are doing infomercials . , remember Patti Reilly moving to LA to be a star, she does pillow spots. My question how many pictures a day does she take of herself....someone made a comment about a stepmother when did that happen? Thought her mother recently died.


She has 2 FB pages now. Maybe you missed that part? And I am guessing the comments are taken from those posted under the pictures.... I personally didn't even have time to read those, so it's nice to see someone posting them here.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 25,880
Registered: ‎03-16-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 Miranda1550 said:

Ladies, what am I missing? I went to LRs FACEBOOK page, all I see are pictures of her, and comments about future shows. Did not see any comments about her leaving since the original statement. I still think she wanted more money, and QVC refused. Just my opinion, with the track record so far, all who left are doing infomercials . , remember Patti Reilly moving to LA to be a star, she does pillow spots. My question how many pictures a day does she take of herself....someone made a comment about a stepmother when did that happen? Thought her mother recently died.

The OP stated that Lisa's statements were in response to two of her fan's questions. I would imagine you would have to search all their comments to find these responses. She did not post these as a 'status update' or whatever they call those main posts thingies.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 33,580
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 geezerette said:
On 10/16/2014 BOYINTX said:
On 10/16/2014 LipstickDiva said:

I've posted this in another thread about GILI.

QVC just a few days ago applied for the trademark G.I.L.I. with the classification of jewelry only under this trademark.

Their last application was GILI (no periods) and the classification of goods was jewelry, handbags, skirts, blouses, denim, etc. Another company opposed that filing and Q abandoned the application.

Based on that application, it would appear if GILI continues, it will be only jewelry. Perhaps they are going to merge the handbags, clothing and other accessories into another line or change the name.

another company opposed the filing ? Can this mean another Network opposed the filing as if to attempt to take it over and re launch ? The filing thing always confuses me

Another company (any other company, not necessarily another shopping network) may have opposed that QVC trademark filing because it might have been similar to or the same as one of their trademarks. It may not even be in a similar product line, just the trademark symbol.

It had nothing to do with another network. It was a B&M store who opposed the application and there was another opposition filed that would have been heard if this first opposer wouldn't have gotten the app. nullified.

I don't want to list the company because I'm afraid it will get this thread poofed.

Super Contributor
Posts: 1,281
Registered: ‎09-05-2014

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

I do not do FB--No it caused a ton of confusion gathering all my friends ALL 4 of them ,and we had a heck of a blitz- Anyone can read the front page of public post and at times even go deeper into. I do not go read her FB ..It comes here. Wishing her the best

Valued Contributor
Posts: 608
Registered: ‎10-11-2010

Re: Lisa answers 2 big questions…..

On 10/16/2014 LipstickDiva said:
On 10/16/2014 geezerette said:
On 10/16/2014 BOYINTX said:
On 10/16/2014 LipstickDiva said:

I've posted this in another thread about GILI.

QVC just a few days ago applied for the trademark G.I.L.I. with the classification of jewelry only under this trademark.

Their last application was GILI (no periods) and the classification of goods was jewelry, handbags, skirts, blouses, denim, etc. Another company opposed that filing and Q abandoned the application.

Based on that application, it would appear if GILI continues, it will be only jewelry. Perhaps they are going to merge the handbags, clothing and other accessories into another line or change the name.

another company opposed the filing ? Can this mean another Network opposed the filing as if to attempt to take it over and re launch ? The filing thing always confuses me

Another company (any other company, not necessarily another shopping network) may have opposed that QVC trademark filing because it might have been similar to or the same as one of their trademarks. It may not even be in a similar product line, just the trademark symbol.

It had nothing to do with another network. It was a B&M store who opposed the application and there was another opposition filed that would have been heard if this first opposer wouldn't have gotten the app. nullified.

I don't want to list the company because I'm afraid it will get this thread poofed.

Because the name GILI was to similar to the B&M store or the "product line" was similar?