Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 38,064
Registered: ‎06-11-2011

@Silver Fox1 wrote:

Please stop, enough !!!  If you think her line is to expensive then pass it by and move on to, say, Demim & Co. or C Wonder or whatever.  QVC offers a whole range of styles and prices.  Why a bunch of you on these blogs keep harping on this same subject is beyound me.  Everyone gets it, you think Logo cloths are to exspence and not worth it, good enough but a whole lot of other customers don't think they are to exspence think there worth every penny and love them and good enough for them also.  Enough already !!!!!


@Silver Fox1  Thank you for this post.  And to add my thoughts: how very rude and insulting for people to call clothes "bag lady clothes" knowing full well that many posters here wear them.  It's very disrespectful of someone merely having different tastes than whoever posts that thought.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,566
Registered: ‎04-04-2014

@ALRATIBA

Nice but I think the clearance prices are more in line with what they should have been in the first place. just my opinion. I would however, if I wore cardigans, spend more on them or on a pair of pants then I would for a shirt because, regardless of what Susan Graver says, you're not likely to wear a shirt over and over and over again like you would with a sweater or pair of pants.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,733
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

@Pearlee wrote:

@Silver Fox1 wrote:

Please stop, enough !!!  If you think her line is to expensive then pass it by and move on to, say, Demim & Co. or C Wonder or whatever.  QVC offers a whole range of styles and prices.  Why a bunch of you on these blogs keep harping on this same subject is beyound me.  Everyone gets it, you think Logo cloths are to exspence and not worth it, good enough but a whole lot of other customers don't think they are to exspence think there worth every penny and love them and good enough for them also.  Enough already !!!!!


@Silver Fox1  Thank you for this post.  And to add my thoughts: how very rude and insulting for people to call clothes "bag lady clothes" knowing full well that many posters here wear them.  It's very disrespectful of someone merely having different tastes than whoever posts that thought.


@Pearlee, I think that it's also insensitive to slam those who are homeless.


~Who in the world am I? Ah, that's the great puzzle~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Regular Contributor
Posts: 244
Registered: ‎08-17-2015

I agree, her items are getting out of hand on the pricing.

I know how she just bought a new house she has been talking about. Look at the prices of the items.  Frankly who wants to layer three or more items just to make a "statement" as she calls it.  Are we in high school?

I have quit buying her brand and went over to EVINE   I got a lace trimmed tank, same material, same lace, a great length, and easy care for $29.99.  Last night's show with Amy was over the top expensive.  I have moved away from buying these items.  Maybe if more customers would do that the prices would come down. 

Regular Contributor
Posts: 244
Registered: ‎08-17-2015

all of the lines are getting way too pricey QVC is not a network I am shopping at any longer. They used to have some great prices, but I don't see it any longer.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 33,580
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

I don't own a ton of LOGO.  I do think a lot of the prices are out of line.  However, I do own some of her rayon/spandex items and I have never, ever had an issue with them.  They do not pill, they do not fall apart and I have washed and worn them a number of times.

 

OTOH, I have now tossed, as of yesterday, my third rayon/spandex top from another network.  Sure the price was a lot cheaper however, all three of these pieces pilled beyond help and one of them got a worn spot right in the center of the neckline which caused white binding (or whatever was underneath the v-neck) to show threw, making the top unwearable.  All 3 of those shirts were purchased last year so they lasted 1 season.   They were cheaper but they were a complete waste of money now sitting in the trash.

 

I do expect to be able to wear my tops over and over and over again.  Yes I switch my tops out more than I switch out my pants but I don't expect my tops to be one and done.  I don't buy new tops on a daily or even weekly basis. 

  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,020
Registered: ‎05-06-2016

The LOGO horse has been beaten into the ground so much it's probably down at the Earth's core by now. We know many of you don't like the line, think women look like homeless bag lady clowns, and are stupid to pay such high prices for clothing. 

 

It's not going anywhere. This is a top selling line and many women, including myself, enjoy it. Yes, prices are high - that's why I buy when it's on sale or at the outlets. And contrary to popular belief, you don't have to layer or mix up colors. 

 

Honestly, aren't you bashers tired of the complaining? It's as old as King Tut's tomb. Yes, I know you're entitled to your opinion but it's nothing but old arguments being rehashed. Move on. Nobody's forcing you to watch the segments or buy. 

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 5
Registered: ‎08-05-2018

We're frustrated because we like the prints & colors but everything is cut for size 14 or higher. WHAT ABOUT US SLIM GIRLS....we dont want to wear tents which is what they are to us. 

 

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 5
Registered: ‎08-05-2018

Personall, I think she's color blind. The color combinations are often ridiculous and clown like. Plus, all clothes are designed for size 14+. Anyone thinner than a size 8 or shorter than 5'6' just looks ridiculous....Someone said "bag lady".......I have to agree. 

Occasional Contributor
Posts: 5
Registered: ‎08-05-2018

I think the hope is that LOGO/QVC will listen to customers who are saying "to pricey" and "too tent like."  Why does every top have to hang to your knees and swing like it's got 5 yrds. of fabric. Make something slim...we're not all size 14.                                    

We all dont want to hide our bodies....