Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 11,153
Registered: ‎05-22-2012

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................


@SilleeMee wrote:

Two-piece-faux-leather-skirt-culottes-legging-black-legging-bronzier-culottes.jpg

 

Just wanted to know. Woman Happy


It has an attitude attached to it. I know some people who could get away with this in their 60s and some who couldn't get away with it in their 20s.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,834
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

Looks like my daughter and the way she dresses @ age 54 this year.  She is 4'9" and about 100 lbs.  She looks 25, so it,s more figure and looks than age for me.  I don,t like it for any age, but I,m from a different time of dressing.

 

 

 

 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 8,958
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

[ Edited ]

The ultra wide belt would throw me off, but I don't actually see YOUNG or OLD.

 

Oh-oh. Just read back and noticed that the "belt" is a SKIRT! 

 

YES to tall and thin!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 37,759
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

@ChynnaBlue,

I think you hit the nail on the head.Woman Very Happy

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,395
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

[ Edited ]

When I see a short skirt and tights, I think young, very young.

 

I like this look.

 

Frederique:

Honored Contributor
Posts: 44,347
Registered: ‎01-08-2011

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

I agree with iwantcoffee.  

 

Short skirts are for the very young.

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,120
Registered: ‎04-17-2015

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

First outfit:  For the under 25 and slim, however, I personally wouldn't wear that outfit because it is overdone, too much leather, and trying way too hard to be noticed.

 

Second outfit: (woman in animal tunic):  I don't compare that with the first outfit because this woman looks like she's wearing slim leg pants or jeggings, which is not the same as wearing a mini-skirt with tights, so the outfit in an of itself, is appropriate.  Still, that's not my style.  I don't wear large areas of animal print.  Tacky, IMO.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 37,759
Registered: ‎05-22-2016

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

Legacy Ankle Length Faux Leather Skirted Leggings A257454

These are still popluar. That's SK on the right.

download (1).jpg

Honored Contributor
Posts: 42,254
Registered: ‎08-23-2010

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

@SilleeMee

 

Not sure how you "attach" an age to anything ....

 

It's my observation that most 40 year old women don't look 40 ... whatever looking 40 means, lol.     

 

I'm very sure there are women of any age that can pull this look off, but IMO, if you have to ask ... it's not for you.    Don't even try.  

Respected Contributor
Posts: 3,120
Registered: ‎04-17-2015

Re: Does this outfit have an age attached to it?.......................

[ Edited ]

@SilleeMee wrote:

Legacy Ankle Length Faux Leather Skirted Leggings A257454

These are still popluar. That's SK on the right.

download (1).jpg


Well, I have made this point several times here about skirted leggings/skorts.  I don't care what you name it or what the person feels like they're wearing, it still looks like a mini-skirt (and tights), so IMO looks ridiculous on an older woman.

 

Is this the point you are trying to make, OP?  lol