Like any other disease entity, the feasibility of testing the entire population is limited. More to the point, what about those who do not agree to get tested? Are they to be forced to? Are we then to all potentially be tattooed with who's 'safe' and who's not? Where does the line get drawn? From where I sit, testing is not the issue, preventing the illness and effective treatments should be the priority. At the snail's pace at which things seem to be moving, once these things are in place, a valid testing protocol, which is now lacking, will perhaps have been developed and testing, overall, will be less of a concern and will have fewer potentially negative social implications.
In my pantry with my cupcakes...